Infant Mortality In USA Improves, But Still Compares Badly With Other Industrialized Nations
Featured ArticleMain Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 11 Nov 2007 - 12:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.33 (6 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
While the infant mortality rate in the USA has carried on to falling, compared to other industrialized nations around the globe, the country is ranked very near the bottom. In 1960 US infant mortality rate stood at 26 deaths per 1,000 births, while in 2006 it improved to 7 deaths per 1,000 births (Save the Children).
Even though child mortality rates have improved in the USA, over the last half-century other industrialized countries have progressed faster and moved ahead. Japan has the best rates in the world with 1.8 deaths per thousand live births.
Most statistics that come out of the USA reveal a nation with much more acute inequalities among social/ethnic groups, compared to the other industrialized nations. Even countries such as Slovenia, Lithuania, and Estonia are enjoying superior infant mortality rates (compared to the USA). In fact, if current trends continue, it will not be long before the USA slips further down, making way for several developing nations.
Below you can see the list of newborn deaths per 1,000 live births in the top 33 industrialized countries. They are grouped from A to F. A is the group with the best rates, while F has the worst. Each group is listed alphabetically.
Deaths per 1,000 births - 2006
(Source - Save the Children)
Group A
- Japan 1.8 deaths per 1,000 live births
Group B
- Czech Rep 2 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Finland 2 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Iceland 2 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Norway 2 deaths per 1,000 live births
Group C
- Austria 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- France 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Germany 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Israel 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Italy 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Luxembourg 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Portugal 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Slovenia 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Spain 3 deaths per 1,000 live births
Group D
- Australia 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Belgium 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Canada 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Denmark 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Estonia 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Greece 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Ireland 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Lithuania 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Netherlands 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- New Zealand 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Switzerland 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
- United Kingdom 4 deaths per 1,000 live births
Group E
- Hungary 5 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Malta 5 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Poland 5 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Slovakia 5 deaths per 1,000 live births
- USA - 5 deaths per 1,000 live births
Group F
- Latvia 6 deaths per 1,000 live births
Written by׃
Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/88418.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/88418.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Infant mortality
posted by Michael Ryan on 22 Nov 2007 at 7:30 amAverage infant mortality rates for a country, or a Borough, hide the true variations in rates.
Greater London has 625 electoral wards, and forty of those wards had zero infant deaths recorded during the four-year period 2003-6. Those forty "zero infant death" wards were all free from PM2.5 emissions from incinerators.
During the same 4-year period, there were forty-two electoral wards in London with infant mortality rates of 10.0 per 1,000 live births or above. These 42 "high infant mortality wards" were all clearly associated with one or more of the incinerators affecting parts of Greater London.
There were plenty of poor people, and single mothers, and smokers in the 40 wards with zero infant deaths, but none of their babies died. If there's any researcher in the world who recalls Dr John Snow's cholera studies of the 19th centrury, perhaps they could apply the same techniques and make the correct deduction that exposure to industrial PM2.5 pollution causes elevated rates of infant mortality and also elevated rates of low birthweight babies and als elevated rates of a range of other health parameters as well as the rate of premature deaths at all ages.
Kind regards,
Michael Ryan, BSc, C Eng, MICE
Shrewsbury
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





