Reducing Nicotine Addiction Could Help Smokers Quit
Featured ArticleMain Category: Smoking / Quit Smoking
Also Included In: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs; Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 14 Nov 2007 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.67 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A new US study has shown it is possible to reduce smokers' dependence on nicotine by gradually reducing the nicotine content of their cigarettes and thereby making it easier to quit altogether.
The study is the work of researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center and is to be published in the November 14th issue of the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, although it has not yet appeared in the early online edition.
Dr Neal Benowitz, professor of medicine, biopharmaceutical sciences, psychiatry and clinical pharmacy at UCSF, and co-leader, tobacco control program at UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, led the study and with his colleagues enrolled 20 healthy adult smokers to participate in the study.
The participants smoked their usual brand of cigarettes for a week and then switched to six weeks where they were given cigarettes with progressively diminishing amounts of nicotine. After this time they could go back to their usual brand, which most did.
However, when they were followed up a month later, the participants were smoking about 40 per cent fewer cigarettes a day compared to what they were smoking before the study. Also, one quarter of them gave up entirely during the course of the study.
Benowitz said their findings supported the idea that if tobacco companies were forced to reduce levels of nicotine in cigarettes, young people starting out as smokers could avoid becoming addicted, and older longer term smokers could quit or reduce their smoking. "This could spare millions of people from the severe health effects of long-term smoking," he added.
The current system of tobacco companies offering products advertised as low nicotine alternatives does not change the level of nicotine that smokers absorb, said the researchers.
Congress is currently looking at bringing in legislation to give the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) powers to force tobacco companies to reduce nicotine yields in cigarettes so they would be less addictive, said Benowitz.
The new study counters the argument put forward by some experts that reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes would just cause smokers to smoke more of them, which would then increase health risks due to toxins, which is what happens with smokers who use the currently marketed low nicotine products, explained Benowitz.
Studies have shown that cigarettes currently marketed as low nicotine do not contain lower absolute levels of nicotine although they do reduce nicotine intake when they are tested by smoking machines. The total nicotine content of these cigarettes is still high, but the manufacturers use paper that is more porous and engineer the cigarettes to burn faster, so when smoked by a machine the nicotine yield over the course of the cigarette is lower than a comparable normal nicotine cigarette. However real smokers compensate by taking bigger and more frequent puffs, said the researchers.
The cigarettes used in the study had a lower total overall level of nicotine, so it was impossible, or very difficult, to compensate by taking bigger and more frequent puffs.
In this study Benowitz and colleagues also tested the participants' exposure to carbon monoxide, carcinogens in the tobacco smoke, and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. All levels of these variables stayed the same or went down, showing that the smokers were not taking in higher amounts of tobacco smoke toxins when they changed over to the reduced nicotine cigarettes.
Benowitz and another research colleague, Jack Henningfield, wrote a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1994 suggesting that legislation should be brought in forcing manufacturers to gradually reduce the nicotine in all cigarettes on sale in the US.
The researchers are now in the process of setting up a larger scale clinical study to replicate the findings in a more robust way. They are also looking at whether reduced nicotine cigarettes reduce the potential for addiction among adolescents smokers who are still at the experimenting stage.
Click here for the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
Click here for UCSF website.
Written by: Catharine Paddock
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/88794.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/88794.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Growing Job Opportunities Initiatives
posted by Steve Hartwell on 17 Nov 2007 at 8:51 amWith computers taking over so many jobs more and more it is extremely difficult to find things for people to do. We are very quickly running out of burger-flipping and fries employment and new ideas to occupy the jobless millions is desparately needed.
I applaud the anti-everything people for their creative new job opportunities iniatives. Expanding "Risk Reduction Consulting and Enforcement" is a logical next step already well developed. The potentials are endless, huge, and promisingly very very lucrative.
I can see it now. Sex without Semen; Crying without Tears; Eating without Farting or Belching or Crapping; Exhaling without Inhaling Industrial and Vehicular Pollution; Dancing without Music; Sleeping without Wasting 8 hours; War without Death; Working without getting Paid for it; Transporting without Vehicles; Chocolate Bars without Chocoldate; Books without Words; Politics without Politicians; Medicare without Medicare Practiioners; Doing things without Thinking; -- it's all very hope-renewing to see all of this coming about so quickly, because I understand that burgers and fries are next on the list to be banned too. - One question - once everything is banned - what do we all do then ? Oh, yes, of course. By then we'll be the Human Race without Humans. Problems Solved!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






