Genetic Research May Have Unintended Consequence For Ethnic Groups
Main Category: GeneticsArticle Date: 11 Dec 2007 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
1 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 0 posts |
Genetic research that holds the promise of one day preventing and curing disease may also pose an unrecognized threat of tearing apart minority groups. In an article written for The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, bioethics professor Joan McGregor, Ph.D., of Arizona State University, explains how genetic research can devastate minority communities, such as Native American populations.
Ethnic groups attract researchers because of their genetic differences from the general population. These groups suffer disproportionately from disease, and seemingly would have much to gain from genetic studies. Deaths from alcoholism and diabetes, for example, are much higher among Native Americans than other ethnic groups. Researchers unfamiliar with Native American culture may assume they're providing the group a great service. Seldom do they realize their study can destroy the group's esteem.
"Genomic research can have significant, but sometimes unrecognized, harm to minority groups," McGregor said.
Discrimination from employers or insurers is one potential consequence of a group being associated with a genetic disease. Results of genetic tests also could create legal snarls. Native Americans might lose historic land rights, McGregor suggests, if tests reveal discrepancies in their presumed lineage. The greatest threat she sees is loss of identity. Tribes build their culture on historical narratives. Studies that refute their ancestry would destroy their sense of who they are.
To minimize the risk of group harms, McGregor recommends researchers go beyond the requirement of individual informed consent. She urges them to include a Native American on the board that reviews their study and to also obtain the group's consent from a tribal leader.
"Research ethics must ensure that it addresses the value difference of discreet populations," McGregor said.
A leading peer-reviewed journal for research at the intersection of law, health policy, ethics, and medicine, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics is the authoritative source for health law teachers, practitioners, policy makers, risk managers, and anyone involved with the safe, equitable, and ethical delivery and promotion of the public's health. For more information, please visit http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jlme.
Wiley-Blackwell was formed in February 2007 as a result of the acquisition of Blackwell Publishing Ltd. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., and its merger with Wiley's Scientific, Technical, and Medical business. Together, the companies have created a global publishing business with deep strength in every major academic and professional field. Wiley-Blackwell publishes approximately 1,400 scholarly peer-reviewed journals and an extensive collection of books with global appeal. For more information on Wiley-Blackwell, please visit http://www.blackwellpublishing.com or http://interscience.wiley.com.
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2010 MediLexicon International Ltd |




