Does Treating Worms In People With HIV Slow Progression To AIDS?

Main Category: HIV / AIDS
Article Date: 18 Dec 2007 - 17:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   view / write opinions   rate article

Of the 25 million people infected with HIV-1 in Africa, as many as half are thought to be co-infected with worms (helminths), and there is evidence that these worms may result in a more rapid progression of HIV infection to AIDS. Does treating these worms ("de-worming") slow down this progression?

In a new study published in the open access journal PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Judd Walson and Grace John-Stewart at the University of Washington, Seattle, USA set out to answer this question. Their study found that there were simply not enough data to make any firm conclusions, and they call for larger, well-designed studies to help come to a definitive answer.

In their study, the investigators did an exhaustive search (known as a systematic review) to find every study ever conducted examining the link between being infected with worms and the progression of HIV to AIDS. In their final analysis, they included only those studies that met the researchers' pre-specified quality criteria.

There were five studies in the final analysis. All five were limited by short follow up times. Only one of these was a randomized controlled trial (RCT)-it compared the effects of treating worms in people with HIV against no treatment. The trial did find some benefit from the de-worming treatment. In patients with HIV who did not receive the de-worming treatment, their viral load (a measure of the amount of HIV in their bloodstream) went up. In contrast, the viral load of patients who were de-wormed remained stable. However, de-worming was not associated with improvements in the patients' immune status (as measured by the CD4 count) or in their clinical condition.

The four other included studies, which were observational studies rather than RCTs, also suggested that treating worms could have a beneficial effect as measured by a patient's viral load. But again these studies showed no benefit in terms of a patient's immune status or clinical condition.

"After a comprehensive review of the available literature," say the authors, "we conclude that there is not enough evidence to determine whether treating helminth infections in people with HIV is beneficial."

"There is a need for large randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up duration in order to assess the impact of de-worming on HIV-1 progression in populations with a high prevalence of both helminth and HIV-1 infection."

In a linked Expert Commentary entitled "Helminth-HIV Co-Infection: Should We De-Worm?", Professor Zwi Bentwich (Ben Gurion University, Israel) and colleagues, who were not involved in the study, examine the evidence that helminth infections play a major role in the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection in Africa.

"Helminth infections have an ongoing prolonged and wide negative effect on the health of the population, irrespective of their effects on HIV and possibly other infections as well," say Bentwich and colleagues. "Thus, control of helminths should be pursued in large parts of the developing world without delay and should not await the results of studies on the impact of helminths on HIV or on other infections."

CITATION: Walson JL, John-Stewart G (2007) Treatment of Helminth Co-Infection in Individuals with HIV-1: A Systematic Review of the Literature. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 1(3): e102. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000102
Please click here (link will go live on Wednesday, December 19, 2007)

Disclaimer

This press release refers to an upcoming article in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. The release is provided by journal staff. Any opinions expressed in these releases or articles are the personal views of the journal staff and/or article contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of PLoS. PLoS expressly disclaims any and all warranties and liability in connection with the information found in the releases and articles and your use of such information.

About PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment, and control of the neglected tropical diseases, as well as public policy relevant to this group of diseases. All works published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are open access, which means that everything is immediately and freely available subject only to the condition that the original authorship and source are properly attributed. The Public Library of Science uses the Creative Commons Attribution License, and copyright is retained by the authors.

http://www.plosntds.org/

About the Public Library of Science

The Public Library of Science (PLoS) is a non-profit organization of scientists and physicians committed to making the world's scientific and medical literature a freely available public resource.

Public Library of Science
185 Berry Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA 94107
USA