Tougher Measures Needed To Reduce Alcohol Related Harm, Say UK Doctors
Featured ArticleMain Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 24 Dec 2007 - 0:00 PDT
email to a friend 
printer friendly 
opinions
Two top doctors have called on the UK government to employ tougher measures to reduce alcohol related harm.
Ian Gilmore, President, Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Nick Sheron, a liver specialist at Southampton University Hospital say that current measures, such as education and public information have not done much to change people's drinking behavior or to reduce harm. Proven measures should be considered, such as price hikes, forbidding the advertising of alcohol, and reducing alcohol's availability.
The authors explain that alcohol is most definitely a significant health problem in the UK. Alcohol is causing more deaths than cervical cancer, breast cancer and MRSA combined.
They ask whether we have a duty to find a way of reducing alcohol's health burden to society - or would this be an example of creating a nanny state.
Alcohol is the cause of much more damage to third parties than smoking, they write. Half of all violent crimes and one third of domestic violence cases are caused by alcohol to some degree.
The authors point to evidence that raising the price of alcohol is the most successful and cost effective way to alter drinking behavior. While disposable income in the UK grew by 91% during the period 1980-2003 the price of alcohol just went up by 24%. This means that alcohol was 54% cheaper in real terms in 2003 than it was in 1980.
Retailers and producers say that raising alcohol prices would not reduce consumption. If this were true, say the authors, then all the fundamental principles of marketing are wrong (people buy less of something when it becomes more expensive, they buy more of something when it becomes cheaper).
The authors wonder how many more British lives will be damaged before the government does anything really concrete about it.
"Reducing the harms of alcohol in the UK"
Ian Gilmore, Nick Sheron
BMJ 2007;335:1271-1272 (22 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39426.523715.80
Click here to read the full Editorial
Written by - Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/92681.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/92681.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Alcohol Would Be A Class 'A' Drug If Introduced Today.
posted by Peter O'Loughlin on 25 Dec 2007 at 4:56 amThe authors of this report are to be congratullated in their clear non rhetorical presentation of the facts. No doubt the all powerful alcoholic drinks industry wiil hit back with some diversionary tactics, safe in the knowledge that the Government's take from alcohol sales, not mention the generous party donations, will ensure the continuing and widespread advertising which makes alcohol appear to be both life style enhancing and glamorous.
If someone were to introduce a drug today which caused rapid change in brain reactions,, induced mood swings, brought about swift and unpredictable changes in behaviour, including violence, verbal abuse and generally anti social behaviour, intimidating to the point that some people are too frightened to enjoy an evening in our high streets, it would be outlawed and given a class A rating.
However since alcohol is so much a part of our culture, and can do much to enhance a pleasant situation, we have to learn to live with it, but that does not mean it should not be more strictly conntrolled in distribution and consumption.
The authors quite rightly point out that the damage caused by alcohol, is in many ways, much greater than that caused by smoking, the restrictions regarding consumption of the latter are so rigid, as to all but prohibit it. Whilst such draconian restrictions cannot be applied to alcohol, there are considerable measures which can and should be taken to limit both suplly and consumption, which both Professor Gilman and Nick Heron have clearly shown to be effective.
There is one more measure this writer would suggest and that is a complete ban on street drinking, enforced with zero tolerance, where hordes of drinkers impede the lawful right of citizens to pass without fear of harrasssment. A common sight in our towns.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
Privacy Policy |
Terms and Conditions
MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, United Kingdom
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2012 All rights reserved.
