Smokers May Need A £10permit Soon To Buy Cigarettes In England
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Smoking / Quit Smoking
Also Included In: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal Drugs; Public Health
Article Date: 16 Feb 2008 - 14:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.75 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A UK Government Health Advisory Body, called Health England, says English smokers should be made to pay £10 ($20) for a Smoker's Permit - without this permit they would not be able to buy cigarettes, cigars, loose tobacco or pipe tobacco.
According to Health England Chairman, Professor Julian Le Grand, in a BBC interview, this measure would have a significant impact in reducing the number of smokers in the country.
Forest, a lobby group that represents the wishes of smokers, has labeled this proposal as "outrageous". The UK already has virtually the most expensive cigarettes in the world, where a packet of 20 cigarettes costs about $11 - most of the cost is made up of tax.
Le Grand says the £10 should go to the National Health Service. However, many comment that the UK Government already collects billions of pounds each year in tobacco tax and makes a tidy profit when tobacco related NHS costs are compared to this income. It could be easily argued that the British smoker is already subsidizing the health of non-smokers (if the government were to dedicate all its tobacco-tax collections to the National Health Service).
Le Grand believes the hassle of getting a permit, which he says would be complicated, may put many smokers off, thus reducing the number of people who smoke. Le Grand said "You've got to get a form, a complex form - the government's good at complex forms; you have got to get a photograph. It's a little bit of a problem to actually do it, so you have got to make a conscious decision every year to opt in to being a smoker."
As 70% of smokers want to give up, this obstacle may help them make the decision, Le Grand believes. He says that if the state were to make it that bit more difficult for people to restart in the first place, it should make a substantial difference to their chances of staying off tobacco.
Simon Clark, of Forest, said that the mind boggles when one thinks of the cost of the extra bureaucracy and enforcement. He added that the ones who would suffer the most would be elderly and low income smokers. All this will do as add to the red tape that has been piling up in England.
At Medical News Today we have received several comments on this issue, from smokers, non-smokers and parents. The arguments tend to follow three main themes.
1. Human rights. The smoker already pays enormous amounts of tax. What next? A licence for obese people to buy chocolates?
2. From non-smoking and smoking parents. This measure may perhaps make it less easy and less attractive for youngsters to start smoking in the first place.
3. From smokers and non-smokers. This government likes to meddle in everybody's affairs. This measure will create a huge black market which will make it even harder for the police and authorities to work properly. How will it be enforced? Will there be inspectors closing down shopkeepers who do not ask for a licence? What about a tourist who smokes - will he/she have to fill in a complicated form as well, even if he/she is in England for just a couple of days?
-- Forest
-- Health England
Written by - Christian Nordqvist
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/97603.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/97603.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Obsessed & Oppressive Interference.
posted by Peter O'Loughlin on 17 Feb 2008 at 6:23 amProf Le Grand obviously occupies another planet where he can rule everything and everyone, and of course dictate what they should eat, drink or otherwise consume and when they should do it. In short he is an ideal spokesman for Gordon Brown who is also obsessed with control.
Everyone knows that smoking damages health and smoking related disease accounts for around 130,000 deaths a year in the UK. Horrific as that figure is, it is a very small percentage of the 20 million or so smokers in the UK.
As far as I'm aware smoking does not cause any mental disorders, nor does it result in users becoming violent, or using the streets of our cities and towns as a public toilet. Nor as far as I'm aware, do smokers intimidate others, or indulge in anti social behaviour, or been labelled nicotine louts. Nevertheless, our rulers have outlawed the practice of smoking in public places, thus effectively ensuring a form of 'house arrest' for those who choose to smoke.
Since apparently that is not sufficient for smokers to save themselves from a fate worse than death, this obsessed lunatic, is demanding smokers buy a permit to indulge in the consumption of a legal product in the privacy of their own home. No doubt he would also, as he has indicated elsewhere, like to control the eating habits of the nation. How much longer is our society expected to put up with such arrant , undesirable and unwarranted interference?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





