Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited Or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 17 Feb 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Health Professional: | ![]() |
|
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
UroToday.com- This article further strengthens the argument that an extended lymph node dissection improves staging accuracy and survival in patients with invasive bladder cancer. Investigators at two different institutions (Cleveland Clinic and University of Bern) evaluated their long-term outcomes after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Surgeons at the Cleveland Clinic performed a limited pelvic node dissection that encompassed the nodal tissue below the common iliac artery and surgeons at the University of Bern performed an extended lymph node dissection including the common iliac and presacral nodes.
Limited and extended lymph node dissections were performed in 336 and 322 patients, respectively. All cases were staged N0M0 prior to radical cystectomy, and none were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients with PTis/pT1 and pT4 disease were excluded from analysis. The lymph node positive rate was 13% and 26% for limited and extended lymph node dissection patients. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for lymph node positive patients was 7% and 35% in limited and extended lymph node dissection, respectively. Even for patients with node negative bladder cancer, patients with an extended lymph node dissection had a better disease-free survival. The 5-year disease-free survival for pT2N0 and pT3N0 patients undergoing a limited and extended lymph node dissection was 67% and 77%, and 23% and 57% (p<0.0001).
This data in combination with the results from Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Southern California, confirm that an extended lymph node dissection should be performed for cT2-cT3 bladder cancer.
Dhar NB, Klein EA, Reuther AM, Thalmann GN, Madersbacher S, Studer UE.
J Urol. ePub: January 25, 2008
Doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.076
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor David P. Wood, M.D
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
----------------------------
Copyright © 2007 - UroToday
Reproduced for Medical News Today with permission of UroToday.
----------------------------
|
Please rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add to:
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
| Back to top | Back to front page | List of All Medical Articles |
| Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © 2008 MediLexicon International Ltd |




