Increased Lung Cancer Risk Associated With Certain Vitamin Supplements
Editor's ChoiceMain Category: Lung Cancer
Also Included In: Public Health; Nutrition / Diet; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 29 Feb 2008 - 4:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.95 (22 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4.38 (8 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
A recent study published in the American Thoracic Society's American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine reports that vitamin supplements do not protect against lung cancer, and may in fact increase the risk of developing it.
Dr. Christopher G. Slatore of the University of Washington and colleagues performed the analysis by selecting a prospective cohort of 77,126 people between 50 and 76 years of age who were all in the Washington State VITAL (VITamins And Lifestyle) program. The researchers analyzed the rate of lung cancer development over four years and how it correlates with current and past vitamin usage, smoking, and other characteristics pertaining to demography and medical history.
Slatore writes, "Our study of supplemental multivitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E and folate did not show any evidence for a decreased risk of lung cancer." In addition, he notes that participants who increased intake of supplemental vitamin E had slightly higher risks of lung cancer.
From the 77,126 people, 521 developed lung cancer; this is in line with the expected rate for this low-risk group. However, those who did develop lung cancer had a slight significant association between lung cancer and supplemental vitamin E in addition to the typical associations with smoking history, family history, and age.
According to the model, a person taking 100 mg/day of vitamin E for ten years increases the risk of lung cancer by seven percent. This is like a 28 percent increase in risk for a 400 mg/day dose for ten years. Slatore notes that this increase in risk was largely confined to current smokers.
Since so many people currently or used to smoke and so many people take vitamin supplements, the study findings can benefit public health. "Future studies may focus on other components of fruits and vegetables that may explain the decreased risk [of cancer] that has been associated with fruits and vegetables," notes Dr. Slatore. "Meanwhile, our results should prompt clinicians to counsel patients that these supplements are unlikely to reduce the risk of lung cancer and may be detrimental."
An editorial in the same journal issue by Dr. Tim Byers of the University of Colorado School of Medicine suggests people want to easily take a pill instead of eating a healthy diet, and this is why they believe that vitamin supplements are healthy or relatively harmless.
However, "fruits contain not only vitamins but also many hundreds of other phytochemical compounds whose functions are not well understood," writes Byers. One study found a 20 percent increase in cancer risk among people who ate the least amount of fruit, and this has led to the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Cancer Society to recommend two fruit servings each day.
Two servings of fruit per day "would likely lead to a reduced risk for lung cancer, as well as reduced risk of several other cancers and cardiovascular disease," writes Dr. Byers. "However, any benefit to the population of smokers from increasing fruit intake to reduce cancer risk by 20 percent would be more than offset if even a small proportion of smokers decided to continue tobacco use in favor of such a diet change."
Long-Term Use of Supplemental Multivitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, and Folate Does Not Reduce the Risk of Lung Cancer
Christopher G. Slatore, Alyson J. Littman, David H. Au, Jessie A. Satia, and Emily White
American. Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2008; 177: pp. 524-530.
doi:10.1164/rccm.200709-1398OC
Click Here to View Abstract
Written by: Peter M Crosta
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/98967.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/98967.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Biased Results
posted by Dr. John Mitchell on 29 Feb 2008 at 8:45 amToo many variables exist for this retrospective study. Thus, it is a very flawed study. It was very biased in that they picked one common variable among all the individuals, (vitamin supplementation) and tried to apply it across the board. How about the millions who also take supplements, who do not get thoracic cancer?
Design a study, using one variable, and testing for that. This is how real science is designed: Double-Blind Placebo Controlled study. Not one (as in this article) that goes back in retrospect and selectively picks out one aspect one a patient's life and arbitrarily applies that to the results.
They also tried these scare tactics with another retrospective study regarding Vitamin E and heart disease in 2004. It was debunked then, as this study should be now.
If I was one of the doctors in this review, I would be embarrassed to call myself a doctor.
At Last - Some Truth
posted by Anon on 29 Feb 2008 at 1:25 pmI was involved in a study a few years ago that was leading in the same direction as this one. Big business arrived and made sure the results never got out.
Thank God some truth is finally coming out. There is too much interference in this world against truth.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





