DrugScope: UN Drug Experts Must Condemn Human Rights Abuses
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsArticle Date: 10 Mar 2008 - 14:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
DrugScope, the UK's leading drug information charity, has responded to the launch of the latest annual report by the UN's International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). DrugScope welcomes the INCB's call for proportionality in the enforcement of drug laws around the world, but considers that the INCB must do much more to condemn the many human rights abuses perpetuated in the so-called 'war against drugs'.
In its latest report, the INCB has highlighted the need for all countries to balance their obligations under the international drug treaties with those of UN human rights legislation. It describes a principle of 'proportionality' that should be applied to all national drug law enforcement (1). The principle states that member countries must ensure that drug law enforcement is proportionate and in full compliance with the rule of law, including international agreements on human rights.
In its consideration of the proportionality principle, however, the INCB makes no specific reference to specific countries where infringements or limitations of human rights are currently taking place. DrugScope and the IDPC are disappointed by these key omissions from the INCB's discussion of proportionality, examples of which include:
- Failure to discuss plans announced by Chinese officials to place a million drug users in compulsory detoxification prior to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing.
- Despite a recent visit to Brazil, the INCB report does not mention the 449 people who were shot and killed in the first half of 2007 in drug enforcement operations by police. Brazilian children, recruited into drug gangs, are considered legitimate targets by police and are shot at frequently in incursions into Rio's favelas.
- The INCB has remained silent on the many human rights abuses and deaths in Thailand during Thaksin Shinawatra's 'war on drugs' in 2003/04; lack of such condemnation from the UN may be contributing to Thailand's current willingness to consider another wave of such extreme enforcement tactics.
- 64 countries retain the death penalty and of those, half apply the death penalty to drug-related offences. This is in violation of international human rights law (1).
- Each year, China uses the UN's International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Drug Trafficking (26 June) as a day to carry out mass, public executions of drug offenders. In 2002, the day was marked by 64 public executions across the country (2).
"Drug users are vilified and marginalised worldwide. Some nations feel that any action against them is justified, including murder. We are encouraged that the INCB recognises this is unacceptable and that a balance must be struck between the enforcement of drug laws and the human rights and civil liberties of those with serious problems.
"But DrugScope and the International Drug Policy Consortium feel that the INCB, from their position of international authority, must follow their condemnation of human rights abuses through to its logical conclusion. The INCB must offer public criticism of particular countries with the worst human rights record in this area."
The International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC) is a global network of national and international NGOs that specialise in issues related to illegal and legal drug use. DrugScope is a founder member of the consortium. You can find out more here: www.idpc.info where you can also download the ICDP's full response to the INCB report.
The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) is an independent and quasi-judicial organisation that monitors the implementation of the United Nations drug control conventions. Each year the INCB spotlights a particular issue of concern in international drug policy and this year the focus is on the principle of proportionality and drug-related offences. You can find out more about the work of the INCB and download the full report here: http://www.incb.org.
(1) The principle of proportionality states that member countries are responsible for ensuring that their enforcement actions against the drug market and drug users are:
- allowed for in national legislation;
- not applied in an arbitrary manner;
- in pursuance of a legitimate aim;
- proportionate to that aim, meaning that the state limits or infringes on the human rights of its citizens no more than necessary.
Source: IDPC response to the 2007 Annual Report of the International Narcotics Control Board, available to download from http://www.idpc.info
(2) Source: The Death Penalty for Drug Offences: A Violation of International Human Rights Law by Rick Lines, is published by IHRA (ISBN 978-0-9557754-0-6) and can be viewed in its entirety at http://www.ihra.net
(3) Source: ibid.
http://www.drugscope.org.uk
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/100064.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/100064.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Failure To Differentiate Between Drug Trafficker And Users Is To Distort The Truth.
posted by peteroloughlin5@hotmail.com on 12 Mar 2008 at 7:59 amWhilst one has sympathy for vulnerable drug users being subjected to draconian penalties; it is difficult to sympathise with members of organised crime syndicates, who knowingly transgress the laws of countries, who the soveriegn right to inflict penalties, including the death penalty for crimes that they consider inflict death and disease on their citizens.
One such country is Singapore, where the death penalty applies only to traffickers who are unable to prove any mitigating circumstances. Drug users on the other hand, especially first time offenders are offered excellent facilities for recovery, without even the stigma of a criminal record.
Not only does the treatment for recovery continue until the user feels able to reintergrate into society without the need for toxic psycho active substance, after care treatment continues, for as long as he or she needs it.
Singapore's policy for users is so successful, that year on year they have achieved what many in pro drug lobby, claim is impossible, a reduction in drug use, drug related diseases and crime. Furthemore, of the reducing number of drug users, just 23 per cent were re-offenders, a record that any western nation, especially the UK would be justly proud of.
For DrugLink or any other organisation, who are genuinely concerned about the human rights of drug users, rather than any desire to bring about global legalisation of drugs, which in turn would lead to more widespread use of drugs, together with an an increase in blood born diseases, drug related deaths and crime, and the consequent total harms to the community.
To fail to differentiate between users and traffickers, is to tacitly endorse the activities of the latter, whilst simultaneously distorting, or concealing, the true facts as to how drug users are treated, together with the reduction in total harms which has been achieved in Singapore,and other countries.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






