Statement By Robert M. Hayes, President, Medicare Rights Center, On The Release Of The Medicare And Social Security Trustees Report
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPArticle Date: 26 Mar 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
5 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
"There have been dire warnings of the imminent insolvency of the Medicare hospital insurance trust fund before, and Congress has addressed them by making careful and measured adjustments to how Medicare pays for services. The Bush administration has rejected that approach and instead proposed draconian across-the-board cuts in its budget or measures that would shift more costs on to people with Medicare and undermine popular support for the program.
"The hospital insurance trust fund is not the key issue facing Medicare. The key issue is whether our nation believes that affordable health care should be a fundamental right for the American people. The central question is whether the government can stand up to the politically powerful industries that recklessly and needlessly drive up the cost of health care for all Americans. President Bush has failed to do so.
"This administration has vowed to veto legislation that makes modest reductions to the excess subsidies received by Medicare private health plans. These private plans cost taxpayers an average of 13 percent more per enrollee than it would cost to provide care under Original Medicare. The overpayments add up to nearly $160 billion over the next ten years.
"Overpayments to Medicare private health plans also add to the annual rise in the Part B premium, which is already $96.40 per month. The premium will likely be higher next year, if, as expected, Congress acts to avert pending cuts in Medicare payments to doctors. If Congress pays for adjustments to Medicare doctor payments by cutting subsidies to Medicare private health plans, however, any increase in the Part B premium would be greatly reduced.
"The rise in the Part B premium makes it even more important that Congress expand access to the Medicare Savings Programs1, which pay the Part B premium and other medical costs for people with low incomes struggling to get by on limited incomes."
1. The Medicare Savings Programs are available to people with Medicare living below 135 percent of the Federal Poverty Level ($1,170 per month for an individual, $1,575 per month for a couple) who have limited savings and other financial assets. The Children's Health and Medicare Protection Act, which passed the House in 2007, would raise the income threshold to 150 percent of the Federal Poverty Level ($1,300 for an individual, $1,750 for a couple) and raise the asset thresholds to allow enrollment by people with Medicare who have modest savings.
Medicare Rights Center (MRC) is the largest independent source of health care information and assistance in the United States for people with Medicare. Founded in 1989, MRC helps older adults and people with disabilities get good, affordable health care.
Medicare Rights Center
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/101666.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/101666.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Statement By Robert Hayes 26 March 2008
posted by Lee Stapleton on 26 Mar 2008 at 5:35 pmI was not surprised. They started to dilute the military benefits for retirees and active duty back in the 1980s and it is no surprise they now are diluting Social Security. Our government and the justice side have brought many in the private sector to trial and sentenced many to prison terms for the same thing they have done to our Social Security system. Why don't they return all the funds they have borrowed from this fund rather than raising the taxes on those of us who pay their salaries and who they are supposed to be working for. It appears if things keep going the way they are now as evidenced by the Bush Administration budget for 2009 we are all in danger of losing many of the benefits promised. The Military members who chose too serve for a career were promised medical benefits at least to age 65. If you want an example of what is coming look at what has happened to those promises. Thank you for allowing me to have a say.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




