Trends In Gleason Score: Concordance Between Biopsy And Prostatectomy Over 15 Years
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Men's health; Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 31 Mar 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.2 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com - Gleason score remains one of the strongest prognostic predictors of treatment outcome in patients with prostate cancer (CaP). The prostate biopsy is a sampling and may not accurately reflect the Gleason score in the final radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. The biopsy Gleason score can impact treatment decisions and outcomes if it does not accurately reflect the true Gleason score and biology of the prostate tumor. For example, some treatments such as brachytherapy are best suited for men with Gleason score 6 or less CaP. In the online version of Urology, Dr. Rajinikanth and the group of Dr. Mark Soloway at the University of Miami report the trends in Gleason score concordance between biopsy and RP over a 15 year period.
A total of 1,363 men who had a RP by Dr. Soloway between 1992 and 2006 were assessed in three groups; group 1 was 1992-1996, group 2 was 1997-2001, and group 3 was 2002-2006. The same pathologist was not reviewing the specimens in all cases. The number of RPs performed increased 2.5 fold from group 1 to group 3. Overall, biopsy and RP Gleason score correlated exactly in 59% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was undergraded in 32% and overgraded in 9%. The Gleason score concordance between biopsy and RP was 39%, 55%, and 70% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Undergrading of the biopsy sample was the most common discordant finding. The rate of undergrading decreased from 53% in group 1 to 20% in group 3. The percentage of overgrading did not differ greatly over the 3 time periods and was about 5%. The data is reassuring to patients that the biopsy is a more accurate reflection of their tumor than it may have been 10 to 15 years previously.
Rajinikanth A, Manoharan M, Soloway CT, Civantos FJ, Soloway MS
Urology. 2008 Feb 14 [Epub ahead of print]
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.022
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102169.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102169.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




