New York State Senate Approves Health Care Package In State Budget
Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical InsuranceArticle Date: 04 Apr 2008 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The New York state Senate on Tuesday approved legislation that would allocate about $59.2 billion -- or nearly half of the $124 billion state budget proposed for fiscal year 2009 -- for health care, the New York Times reports (Peters, New York Times, 4/2). The bill would expand SCHIP eligibility to children in families with incomes up to 400% of the federal poverty level, up from 250% of the poverty level. The expansion would cost $25 million annually and be paid entirely by the state because of to Bush administration regulations tightening eligibility in SCHIP (Matthews, Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, 4/2).
The legislation also includes a provision that would recalculate the state Medicaid hospital payment formula. However, under the plan, the new reimbursement rates would expire after the first year and require authorization from the state Legislature. According to estimates, the new rates would save the state $57 million in the first year (New York Times, 4/2). The savings would be used to increase spending for hospital clinics, emergency departments and ambulatory care. The state also would allocate $45 million for community clinics, medical services and additional payments for providers who have evening and weekend hours, state budget officials said.
According to Deborah Bachrach of the state Department of Health, the legislation would change the payment system for outpatient care that is based on the type of care provided, rather than a flat fee. She said the physician fees would increase by 35% annually under the plan.
The bill also includes $17 million in proposed cuts to nursing homes, compared with $117 million in cuts proposed by Gov. David Paterson (D), and restores $37 million of a proposed $43 million reduction in home care. In addition, state lawmakers approved a $15.6 million loan-forgiveness program, called "Doctors Across New York," under which physicians could receive up to $150,000 for loans if they make a five-year commitment to practice in areas where there are shortages. Two-year grants totaling $100,000 would be available for physicians who establish or join practices or clinics in medically underserved areas. The program would provide up to $5 million to support resident training in community-based areas and funds also would be distributed to minority and low-income students enrolled in medical school programs (Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, 4/2).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102823.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102823.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Impact On Shift Of Medicaid Dollars And Charity Care
posted by james mcniff on 5 Apr 2008 at 8:42 amAn article appeared in the wall street journal on the same day that raises concerns that non-profit hospitals are not providing enough charity care..how does charity care tie into the new reimbursement changes in new york and why could it possibly be bad for the patient?...
In order for the New York change to be a success people need to be enrolled in a state program however if patients know they can now receive charity care without going through this process, what benefit has the state provided?..we have created an incentive for patients to chose charity which is not in their best long term interest....how will the patient be able to see their doctors and get their prescriptions filled?..as a result the push for more charity care will have the unintended consequences of limiting access because they lack coverage.
Emergency rooms could possibly become more crowded because patients know they can get their service for free without availing themselves of any state run program....I believe we need to build incentives and changes in the system that insure that patients and providers have as their first priority to get the patient coverage rather than than taking the course of least resistance and chosing a charity care write off..
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




