Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation (LRC) Of Small Renal Masses
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 06 Apr 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
UroToday.com - A group from Milan, Italy prospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with kidney masses treated with laparoscopic cryoablation over a 7-year period. Beginning in September 2000, 104 patients (mean age 61.6 years; 78 male and 26 female) underwent LRC for renal masses. The mean lesion diameter was 2.2cm. The procedure was performed transperitoneally in 60 cases and in 44 patients it was done retroperitoneoscopically, based upon the tumor position or potential difficulties due to previous abdominal surgery. Fifty-six patients (54%) had concomitant comorbidities.
The intra-operative mean diameter of the ice ball was 4.93cm. All the procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically, except 3 cases that were converted to open surgery, two of them due to bleeding from the site of the cryoprobe insertion (one of them requiring radical nephrectomy). Mean surgical time was 202.6min (range 90-320 min) and mean intra-operative blood loss was 211.6 cc (range 10-3.200 cc). Pathological evaluation of the intra-operative needle biopsies documented renal cell carcinoma in 64 cases, 23 oncocytomas, 6 angiomyolipomas, 1 case of Xantogranulomatous pyelonephritis and 10 cases "undefined" disease. Post-operative stay was 4.7 days (range 2-13). Postoperative complications were always treated conservatively and included 7 cases of transient fever, 2 cases of small peri-renal hematomas, 1 case of pulmonary edema, 9 patients with significant blood loss and 1 case of gross hematuria. Delayed complication included 1 case of UPJ obstruction requiring open pyeloplasty 8 months after surgery and open nephrectomy one year after surgery due to suspected recurrence of the disease. Six patients died during the follow-up, 5 due to previous illness and 1 patient due to worsening cirrhosis one month after surgery. No patients died secondary to renal cancer.
MRI scans on postoperative day one revealed a mean lesion of 4.91cm. Progressive reduction in size of the ablated lesion was visible in all patients with only a renal scar visible after 24 months of follow-up. This remained constant over time with 36 patients being followed up for 5 years and 11 patients for 7. In the question period, Dr. Jewett (Toronto) pointed out that 40% of the patients with benign lesions had unnecessary treatment and perhaps the biopsies should be performed a few weeks prior to the intended procedure.
Presented by: A. Cestari, MD, et al, at the European Association of Urology - 23rd Annual EAU Congress - March 26 - 29, 2008 - Milan, Italy
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor, Christopher P. Evans, MD
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102936.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/102936.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




