Kansas Senate Approves Antiabortion Legislation; Gov. Sebelius Expected To Veto Bill
Main Category: AbortionArticle Date: 08 Apr 2008 - 8:00 PDT
The Kansas Senate on Thursday voted 25-13 to pass a bill (House Substitute for SB 389) that includes a number of antiabortion-related provisions, the Wichita Eagle reports. The bill was sent to Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D), who is expected to veto the measure. According to the Eagle, the bill passed two votes short of the two-thirds majority that would be required to override a veto.
The bill, which adds additional abortion reporting requirements, would expand information physicians must provide to the state when they perform abortions, require that more information be made public, and that abortion clinic employees report suspected abuse of underage girls. During debate, the major point of contention was a provision that would allow siblings, parents, grandparents or the husband of a pregnant woman to go to court to stop her from having a post-21 week abortion if they can argue the procedure might violate state law (Lefler, Wichita Eagle, 4/4). The measure allows a woman who had an abortion after the 21st week of pregnancy and some members of her family to sue for monetary damages if a physician violates the law (Manning, Associated Press, 4/3). The measure also would allow a district or county attorney, as well as the attorney general, to prosecute violations (Wichita Eagle, 4/4).
According to the Associated Press, the measure also would require a physician to meet privately with a woman 30 minutes before the abortion is performed and that the woman provide a written reason for the abortion. The measure also would require a physician to offer a woman the option to see ultrasound images and hear fetal heartbeats if the facility has the equipment. The Kansas State Board of Healing Arts would be required to revoke the medical licenses of physicians who break the law, and state social services would be required to publish an annual report of child sexual abuse cases received from abortion providers without names or other identifying information, the Associated Press reports. Under the bill, minors seeking abortions would be required to provide identification and proof of state residency. The person accompanying the minor also would be required to provide identification, sign a statement about his or her relationship to the minor and identify the father of the fetus, if possible.
Sen. Laura Kelly (D) said the "bill places multiple barriers to a legal procedure. If we were talking about any other medical procedure, there would be 40 no votes." She added, "It seems we are suggesting the woman can't fend for herself and make up her own mind." Sen. Phil Journey (R), who supports the bill, said he hopes Sebelius will sign the bill into law but added that "it's probable she will veto it." Nicole Corcoran, Sebelius' spokesperson, said the governor will have to review the bill after she receives it (Associated Press, 4/3).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2007 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our abortion section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/103108.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/103108.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
The choice of the ovum
posted by DELFIN J BELTRAN MD on 8 Apr 2008 at 7:19 pmIt is a fact of human physiology that when the first sperm enters the ovum, the ovum undergoes changes that prevent penetration by any more sperm, thus creating the new human life. Any surgical or chemical procedure that alters the subsequent intrauterine growth and development of that life with the intent to terminate that life process can be defined as killing that life.
If murder is defined as terminating life, then intrauterine interruption of the growth and development of a fertilized human ova constitutes murder. The question surrounding the political discussion of abortion is inappropriately deflected into the separate question of individual rights. All individuals have the right to free choice and the Supreme Court has confirmed this, but that is not the question that has been avoided by politicians and lawyers and courts. The question is, when does life start. That question has been answered but avoided in the legal debate by those who wish to support the right of a pregnant female to abort, kill, terminate, murder the living, growing, developing, maturing individual in her impregnated uterus. Delfin J Beltran MD
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




