Nursing Homes Increasingly Use Arbitration To Avoid Lawsuits, Reduce Costs
Main Category: Caregivers / HomecareAlso Included In: Seniors / Aging; Public Health; Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 14 Apr 2008 - 5:00 PDT
Nursing home residents and their families increasingly are "giving up their right to sue over disputes about care, including those involving death, as the homes write binding arbitration into their standard contracts," the Wall Street Journal reports. Under arbitration agreements, nursing home residents and their families agree to settle disputes through a third-party arbiter. According to the Journal, "Nursing homes have been among the biggest converts to the practice since a wave of big jury awards in the late 1990s."
The practice has "profound implications" on the nursing home industry, according to the Journal. An industry study released last year found that the average cost of settling cases has declined for nursing homes. At the same time, claims of poor treatment have been increasing, the Journal reports.
Consumer advocates and plaintiffs' lawyers have criticized the arbitration systems for nursing homes, saying that people too often do not understand whether the arbitration clauses are mandatory or that they are waiving their right to sue. Critics say courts should handle such claims. Sens. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) on Wednesday introduced legislation that would prohibit nursing homes from requiring patients to sign an arbitration agreement as a term of service. Martinez said, "It is an unfair practice given the unequal bargaining position between someone desperate to find a place for their loved ones and a large corporate entity like a nursing home."
The American Arbitration Association, which is the largest arbitration provider in the nation, generally refuses to handle cases of nursing home arbitration and opposes arbitration requirements in nursing home claims. The American Health Lawyers Association has a similar stance, and other arbitration groups said they only accept the cases when the agreements are in compliance with law. Eric Tuchmann, general counsel for the American Arbitration Association, said that some patients "really are not in an appropriate state of mind to evaluate an agreement like an arbitration clause."
The nursing home industry says arbitration is relatively inexpensive for plaintiffs and defendants, and allows nursing home staff to focus on patient care, instead of litigation (Koppel, Wall Street Journal, 4/11).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation© 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our caregivers / homecare section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/103806.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/103806.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Arbitration Is A Smoke-Screen
posted by Daughter on 21 Sep 2009 at 12:52 amThis is an option being offered to me presently. To meet with the perpetrators, from the facility, the hospice and the doctor involved in negligent care for my Mother. any discussion now, will not bring my Mother back.
As these professionals are well-aware before the incidents, they know how to prevent a problem. They made the choice to ignore the issues and let my Mother exist in unnecessary discomfort and pain.
It is mind-blogging to realize that the mighty dollar is the focus of how much care a patient receives. Soft words will not be remembered, when the door is shut and the meeting is over. A slap, will sting for a long time afterwards. Everyone remembers the sting of a slap. If, a facility and the staff cannot properly take care of a patient than they need to financially feel the pain. Then, maybe they will make an effort to be more pro-active?
Losing money seems to be the only way to make facilites acknowledge a loss and do something about correcting policy. Talking about what they did wrong and can do better just becomes a waste of emotional strength for the victim's family. They are already hurting. It just becomes too painful to rehash what professionals are SUPPOSED TO DO!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




