ASHP, South Carolina Affiliate Oppose South Carolina Pharmacy Technician Legislation
Main Category: Pharmacy / PharmacistArticle Date: 21 Apr 2008 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
A bill that would increase the pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratio in South Carolina does not serve the public interest, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) told members of the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Committee in a letter urging the committee to refer Senate Bill 1156 back to the Medical Affairs Subcommittee for further study.
Senate Bill 1156 proposes to amend Section 40-43-86 of the Pharmacy Practice Act and increase the pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratio from 3:1 (with two technicians being state certified) to 3:1 (with one technician being state certified) and 4:1 (with two technicians being state certified).
ASHP and its state affiliate, the South Carolina Society of Health-System Pharmacists (SCSHP) oppose the proposal because it has no provision that ensures adequate training of pharmacy technicians, nor is there language regarding accredited programs. The letter from ASHP notes that "Appropriate and accredited training is a necessary protection for public health and a concern that is paramount to the entire population of South Carolina."
The letter points to the results of a recent survey of pharmacists who live and work in South Carolina. When asked if it would be in the public interest to require that all pharmacy technicians meet a consistent standard for education and training; more than 90 percent responded "Yes." Nearly three-quarters of those surveyed agreed that pharmacy practice acts should require technicians to complete an accredited training program and attain Pharmacy Technician Certification Board (PTCB) certification prior to registration.
Click here to read ASHP's letter to members of the South Carolina Medical Affairs Committee.
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Visit our pharmacy / pharmacist section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/104762.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/104762.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



