Annual Treatment For Trachoma, As Recommended By WHO, May Be Unnecessary, If Treatment Coverage High

Main Category: Eye Health / Blindness
Also Included In: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses;  Tropical Diseases;  Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 27 Apr 2008 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:3 stars

2.86 (22 votes)

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

2.95 (21 votes)


Five year study indicates one or two treatments may be enough to eliminate infection

One or two rounds of high coverage mass treatment with azithromycin, rather than the annual treatment recommended by the World Health Organisation, may be enough to eliminate the eye disease trachoma in communities with moderate levels of infection.

The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine's Trachoma Group has written a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine, outlining the findings of a trial some of its members carried out in Kahe Mpya, Tanzania, and calling for a re-think on the way communities affected with trachoma are treated.

As part of the trial, 97.6% of residents were treated with single-dose azithromycin and the prevalence of trachoma fell from 9.5% to 0.1% after two years. A second round of mass treatment was carried out at 24 months, and residents were examined at 42 and 60 months. Those with active trachoma were offered a course of tetracycline eye ointment. After 60 months, three years after the second round of mass treatment, trachoma DNA was not detected in the conjunctiva of any of the 859 patients swabbed, suggesting that the infection had been eliminated.

The World Health Organisation currently recommends three years of annual mass azithromycin treatment before reassessment in communities where prevalence in children aged between one and nine years is 10% or greater.

Dr. Anthony Solomon, lead author of the letter, comments 'Had WHO recommendations on antibiotic use been followed, three or possibly six annual rounds of mass treatment would have been offered in this community, whereas our data suggest that one round was sufficient. The less antibiotic we can use in each community, the more people we'll be able to use donated antibiotic for, and the lower the likelihood of the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains'.

LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE & TROPICAL MEDICINE (LSHTM)
Keppel Street
London
WC1E 7HT
http://www.lshtm.ac.uk

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our eye health / blindness section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
LSHTM. "Annual Treatment For Trachoma, As Recommended By WHO, May Be Unnecessary, If Treatment Coverage High." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 27 Apr. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/105480.php>

APA
LSHTM. (2008, April 27). "Annual Treatment For Trachoma, As Recommended By WHO, May Be Unnecessary, If Treatment Coverage High." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/105480.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Eye Health / Blindness

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Eye Health News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Eye Health / Blindness Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »