NICE Preliminary Decision On Sequential Use Of Anti-TNFs, NICE 'Penny-Pinching' Restricts Patient Choice

Main Category: Arthritis / Rheumatology
Article Date: 30 Apr 2008 - 1:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  


Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


A leading arthritis charity accused the government's health rationing watchdog of 'penny-pinching' in its decision to refuse thousands of people the chance to try an alternative life-changing anti-TNF drug if a first does not work for them.

'Anti-TNFs can slow down the progress of rheumatoid arthritis. We hear so much about NHS choice but patients and clinicians alike will be frustrated by the decision to limit treatment options in this way. But any supposed saving is false - the human cost alone is enormous, not to mention the cost to society and the economy', said Arthritis Care chief executive Neil Betteridge.

'The decision means that people now only have one option (rituximab) if their anti-TNF doesn't work - and if rituximab fails them too, their disease will progress, causing irreversible damage to their joints, disability, poverty, and a significantly shortened life expectancy. It just robs Peter to pay Paul as they will need higher levels of NHS intervention, more in-patient bed days, more orthopaedic surgery, and probably end up leaving their jobs and having to claim incapacity benefit instead of being active, productive members of UK Inc', he said.

'It is a terrible irony that the current NHS buzzword is 'choice;' but this decision restricts choice not on clinical grounds, but on grounds of cost alone. NICE is supposed to make its decisions on grounds of clinical and cost effectiveness, but on this occasion, penny-pinching has been the deciding factor', he said.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) delivered its body blow in today's decision on the sequential use of anti-TNFs, which, if allowed, would have meant that people in England and Wales could try another drug in the same class if the first treatment did not work.

As each person reacts differently, when prescribing, doctors cannot predict which drug will best suit an individual. But it is known that four out of five people respond to a second anti-TNF therapy. In most parts of Europe, sequential use is not only allowed but recommended.

Arthritis Care

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our arthritis / rheumatology section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Arthritis Care. "NICE Preliminary Decision On Sequential Use Of Anti-TNFs, NICE 'Penny-Pinching' Restricts Patient Choice." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Apr. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/105738.php>

APA
Arthritis Care. (2008, April 30). "NICE Preliminary Decision On Sequential Use Of Anti-TNFs, NICE 'Penny-Pinching' Restricts Patient Choice." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/105738.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.




Arthritis / Rheumatology

What is Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Rheumatoid arthritis, sometimes referred to as rheumatoid disease, is a chronic (long lasting), progressive and disabling autoimmune disease that causes inflammation (swelling) and pain in the joints, the tissue around the joints, and other organs in... Read more...

Most Popular Articles





Follow Our Arthritis News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Arthritis / Rheumatology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »