HIV Prevention Funding In Africa Should Be Shifted To Promote Male Circumcision, Partner Reduction Programs, Study Says

Main Category: HIV / AIDS
Also Included In: Sexual Health / STDs;  Men's health
Article Date: 12 May 2008 - 0:00 PDT

Current ratings for:
'HIV Prevention Funding In Africa Should Be Shifted To Promote Male Circumcision, Partner Reduction Programs, Study Says'

Patient / Public:1 star

1 (2 votes)

Healthcare Prof:1 star

1 (1 votes)

Article opinions: 4 posts

Current HIV prevention strategies have had limited success in fighting HIV/AIDS in Africa and should be shifted to promote male circumcision and partner reduction programs, according to a study published Friday in the journal Science, BBC News reports (BBC News, 5/9). The article was published in a special issue of Science to mark the 25th anniversary of the discovery of HIV, London's Times reports (Henderson, Times, 5/9).

Daniel Halperin of the Harvard School of Public Health, Malcolm Potts of University of California-Berkeley School of Public Health and their eight colleagues wrote that HIV prevention strategies usually involve the promotion and provision of condoms, HIV testing, microbicide research, abstinence and the treatment of other sexually transmitted infections that can increase the risk of HIV, according to an HSPH release.

However, condom promotion has not been effective in parts of Southern Africa because the epidemic is generalized and primarily heterosexual in the region, the researchers wrote. Other studies also have shown that HIV testing and treating STIs have not had a significant impact, they noted (HSPH release, 5/9). "Despite relatively large investments in AIDS prevention efforts for some years now, it's clear that we need to do a better job of reducing the rate of new HIV infections," Halperin said, adding, "We need a fairly dramatic shift in priorities, not just a minor tweaking" (BBC News, 5/9). "The vast majority of donor investments in HIV prevention in the generalized epidemics of Africa continue to go to approaches for which the evidence of actual impact is increasingly unclear," he said, adding, "Many of these approaches ... do have important public health benefits and should be continued, but not because we believe they will definitely have a major impact on reducing HIV infections."

According to Halperin, there is "still some foot dragging on more fully implementing those approaches for which the evidence is much stronger, namely to scale up safe, voluntary male circumcision services and to more assertively promote partner reduction," he wrote (Times, 5/9).

According to the researchers, less than 1% of UNAIDS funding has been allocated for male circumcision programs. They add that other, more costly strategies have been less effective in preventing HIV in the region, London's Independent reports.

Studies have shown that routine male circumcision could reduce a man's risk of contracting HIV by at least 60%, but the procedure also could have benefits for women, according to researchers. "Over time, male circumcision, which has been called a 'surgical vaccine,' would probably protect more women, albeit indirectly, than nearly any other achievable HIV prevention strategy," the researchers wrote.

The added, "Unlike most other interventions, male circumcision is a one-time procedure that confers lifelong protection. Modeling suggests that male circumcision could avert up to 5.7 million new HIV infections and three million deaths over the next 20 years in sub-Saharan Africa, many of these among women."

Potts said, "It is tragic that we did not act on male circumcision in 2000, when the evidence was already very compelling," adding, "Large numbers of people will die as a result of this error" (Independent, 5/9).

Reaction
Michael Carter, spokesperson for Aidsmap said, "There is undoubtedly a growing sense of frustration about HIV incidence figures, and this inevitably leads to the search for methods of prevention that appear more effective." He added, "Circumcision and partner reduction do have a role and will have greater success in some settings than others."

Lisa Power, head of policy at the Terrence Higgins Trust said, "Different strategies are needed for different countries and with the United Kingdom's concentration of HIV in specific populations, targeted work is essential" (BBC News, 5/9).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our hiv / aids section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Kaiser. "HIV Prevention Funding In Africa Should Be Shifted To Promote Male Circumcision, Partner Reduction Programs, Study Says." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 12 May. 2008. Web.
22 May. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/107019.php>

APA
Kaiser. (2008, May 12). "HIV Prevention Funding In Africa Should Be Shifted To Promote Male Circumcision, Partner Reduction Programs, Study Says." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/107019.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.



Visitor Opinions (latest shown first)

Dr. Gonzalez Made Me Realize

posted by Liz on 12 May 2008 at 10:27 pm

As an American reading Dr. Gonzalez poignant input, I realize how futile American guns and bibles policies are.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


HIV Rates In UK And USA

posted by Dr. Barry Gonzalez on 12 May 2008 at 10:24 pm

The majority of males in the United Kingdom are not circumcised. The majority of Males in the USA are circumcised.

The prevalence of HIV/AIDS in the USA per 100,000 people is six times greater in the USA than in the UK.

British society is much more promiscuous than American society.

I rest my case.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


HIV And Circumcision

posted by C. ERIC WINTER on 12 May 2008 at 3:00 pm

Circumcision cannot and will not prevent HIV. It has not done so in the USA where the circumcision rate is extremely high, and has been for years. Why will it work in Africa and not here?

Dr. Daniel Halperin seems to be one of the main supporters of this policy. Is Dr Halperin allowing his religious beliefs regarding circumcision to bias his opinion?

Promoting mutilation of African men--circumutilation--will lead them to believe that they are immune to HIV, and they will not take the actual effective steps to prevent it; obviously this will increase the spread. So, generations of African men will be deprived of their full manhood for no purpose whatsoever.

In the past, the pro-circ individuals have tried to say that it prevents STD's, cancer, masturbation and just about any other excuse. These have been disproven. Therefore the pro-mutilation individuals must have some other agenda.

Female circumcision is mutilation.
Male circumcision is mutilation.
Infant circumcision is sexual abuse and UNNATURAL.

Involuntary circumcision is a violation of the basic human right to a whole body.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Circumcision And HIV In Africa

posted by Mark Lyndon on 12 May 2008 at 4:33 am

Circumcision can only possibly help men who have unsafe sex with HIV+ partners, so why this bizarre obsession with genital surgery when we know that ABC works better than circumcision ever could? (ABC=Abstinence, Being Faithful, Condoms).

The studies which allegedly show a reduction in HIV among circumcised men are highly questionable. Not one of them was finished, despite the protective affect appearing to decline well below the oft-reported 65%, and several of the subjects disappeared. The fact that one study described circumcision as "comparable to a vaccine of high efficacy" seems to show clear bias. They appear to have been seeking a certain result. One has to wonder how many of the people promoting circumcision in Africa are themselves circumcised. Daniel Halperin is the grandson of a mohel, so his objectivity is questionable.

Other epidemiological studies have shown no correlation between HIV and circumcision, but rather with the numbers of sex workers, or the prevalence of "dry sex".

The two continents with the highest rates of AIDS are the same two continents with the highest rates of male circumcision. Rwanda has almost double the rate of HIV in circed men than intact men, yet they've just started a nationwide circumcision campaign. . Other countries where circumcised men are *more* likely to be HIV+ are Cameroon, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, and Tanzania. Something is very wrong here. These people aren't interested in fighting HIV, but in promoting circumcision (or sometimes anything-but-condoms), and their actions will cost lives.

Circumcised male virgins are more likely to be HIV+ than intact male virgins, as the operation sometimes infects men.

The latest news is that circumcised HIV+ men are more likely to transmit the virus to women than intact HIV+ men (even after the healing period is over). Eight additional women appear to have been infected during that study, solely because their husbands were circumcised.

Female circumcision seems to protect against HIV too btw, but we wouldn't investigate cutting off women's labia, and then start promoting that.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Add Your Opinion On This Article

'HIV Prevention Funding In Africa Should Be Shifted To Promote Male Circumcision, Partner Reduction Programs, Study Says'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Your Name:*
E-mail Address:*
Your Opinion Title:*
Opinion:*
This is to help prevent SPAM submissions. Please enter the words exactly as they appear, including capital letters and punctuation.*

* Fields marked with a * need to be filled in before you hit the submit button.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


HIV / AIDS

What Is AIDS? What Is HIV?

AIDS (Acquired immune deficiency syndrome or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) is a disease caused by a virus called HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus). Read more...

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our HIV News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our HIV / AIDS Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »