Circulating Tumor Cells Are A Reliable Predictor Of Treatment Response In Metastatic Breast Cancer
Main Category: Breast CancerAlso Included In: Clinical Trials / Drug Trials; Conferences
Article Date: 18 May 2008 - 10:00 PDT
With the goal of tailoring cancer treatment for each individual, researchers at Georgetown University Medical Center have presented a study suggesting a simple blood test can help doctors more reliably assess treatment efficacy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
"It can take several weeks and sometimes months to determine if a particular cancer treatment is working because it can take that long to observe any significant radiographic changes in tumor size or appearance," says Minetta Liu, M.D., of Georgetown's Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center. "Right now, we have to rely on radiology studies such as CT scans, ultrasound, and the like to determine whether or not there is disease progression. With this new blood test, we have another reliable tool that may allow us to determine much sooner if a therapy is ineffective so that we can change therapy earlier and potentially make more significant improvements in survival."
Using the FDA-approved CellSearch™ technology, researchers measured the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in blood collected from women with metastatic breast cancer. About one tablespoon of blood was collected every three to four weeks. The number of CTCs was correlated with disease response or progression as determined by standard radiology studies performed every 9-12 weeks. The women in the study received various treatments including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and combination therapy with a biologic agent.
A CTC count of five was used as the threshold, based on previous studies. There was a highly significant difference in the distribution of progression between two groups of patients defined by their CTC result. Seventy-one percent of patients who had a CTC greater than or equal to five had disease progression, and 66 percent of patients with a CTC count of less than five did not.
"A CTC count of five or greater at the time of restaging was associated with a 5.32 fold increase in a patient's chance of having disease progression compared to CTC counts of less than five," explains Liu. "CTC assessments should be used as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy and disease responsiveness. Changes in CTC results from less than five to greater than or equal to five over time may herald disease progression."
Liu adds that the CTC assay is a more reliable means of assessing treatment response than the traditional tumor markers currently in use.
"We have a follow-up study underway that evaluates CTC results within the framework of a randomized clinical trial to eliminate potential variability from the treatment administered, "says Liu, the national principal investigator of the new trial. Liu and her colleagues believe a study with the same therapies would offer even stronger evidence for routine use of CTC in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
"We have many treatment options for advanced breast cancer. The key is to find the most effective therapy for each patient. It shouldn't take months to figure that out," she concludes.
###
The study was funded by Veridex, LLC, makers of CellSearch. Liu reports receiving limited compensation for research-related speaking engagements on behalf of Veridex.
Liu's preliminary results have been released online in advance of the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. The complete data will be presented during the poster discussion of this study at the annual meeting place in Chicago May 30-June 3.
About Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
The Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, part of Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown University Hospital, seeks to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer through innovative basic and clinical research, patient care, community education and outreach, and the training of cancer specialists of the future. Lombardi is one of only 39 comprehensive cancer centers in the nation, as designated by the National Cancer Institute, and the only one in the Washington, DC, area. For more information, go to http://lombardi.georgetown.edu/.
About Georgetown University Medical Center
Georgetown University Medical Center is an internationally recognized academic medical center with a three-part mission of research, teaching and patient care (through our partnership with MedStar Health). Our mission is carried out with a strong emphasis on public service and a dedication to the Catholic, Jesuit principle of cura personalis -- or "care of the whole person." The Medical Center includes the School of Medicine and the School of Nursing and Health Studies, both nationally ranked, the world-renowned Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Biomedical Graduate Research Organization (BGRO), home to 60 percent of the university's sponsored research funding.
Source: Karen Mallet
Georgetown University Medical Center
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/107728.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/107728.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Finding Positive Chemotherapy Responders
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 24 May 2008 at 11:08 pmYes, response to chemotherapy determined by measuring changes in tumor size with imaging techniques like CT, MRI, and PET can take several weeks and sometimes months to determine if a particular cancer treatment is working.
And yes, a blood test may be another reliable tool to determine sooner if a therapy is ineffective so that therapy can be change earlier and possibly make more significant improvements in survival.
The outcome for metabolic responders and non-responders in imaging or a blood test is basically what is going on with bio-assay, showing what patients are benefiting from what drug agents.
The biggest difference is that with imaging or a blood test, you give the patient potentially toxic and ineffective drugs and wait to make measurements. And then give more potentially toxic and ineffective drugs and wait and repeat measurements.
You still have the patient getting potentially toxic and ineffective treatment and then you still have to wait weeks until you could try Plan B. You measure the drug effects on tumors "in" the patient, one treatment plan at a time.
A chemo-induced gene mutation can happen when the original chemo received does not work. The cancer comes back. When it does this, the cancer comes back more aggressively. The mutagenic effects (changes in form) of chemotherapy on a genetically-unstable tumor, drives the tumor into a state of more aggressive behavior.
Cancers that are a product of these genetic mutations release cells from the usual controls of proliferation and survival, making them so much harder to fight it. Following this mutation, the cancer cells acquire the ability to proliferate without the normal restraints.
As the cancer grows, it may infiltrate and destroy the surrounding tissue, and metastasize by penetrating into blood vessels, lymph nodes, and body cavities. Distant metastasis via the bloodstream may affect virtually any organ.
In a bio-assay, as many as twenty to thirty treatments can be done to see which one works best, "before" they are put in the patient. It does not change cancer biology, it only helps to reveal biology. It lowers the probability that certain drugs will work. It raises the probability that others will work.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





