NACDS Urges House And Senate To Reject Durable Medical Equipment Competitive Bidding Proposals To Help Ensure Patient Access To Pharmacy
Main Category: Pharmacy / PharmacistArticle Date: 27 May 2008 - 0:00 PDT
The National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS) submitted comments to key members of the House and Senate requesting they reject any proposals that would expand the durable medical equipment (DME) competitive bidding program to diabetic supplies sold at retail pharmacies or seek cuts and/or freeze to the DME fee schedule updates.
"NACDS member companies are the primary providers of pharmacy services to beneficiaries with diabetes under the Medicare program," the letter states. "Treatment of diabetes requires very careful management of blood glucose and pharmacists serve on a team with doctors, patients and diabetes educators to help patients manage their diabetes. Unlike other DME products, the effects of the competitive bidding program on diabetic supplies and patients were never evaluated during the competitive bidding demonstration projects. Therefore, expansion of the program to include diabetic supplies sold at retail stores should not be pursued, in the absence of any data to ensure patient access, safety and savings to the Medicare program."
In addition, NACDS urged the Committee to recognize that DME fee schedules have not been updated since 2004 to properly reflect the cost of providing DME products and services.
"Despite inflation and increased costs in providing these services, some have proposed that the DME fee schedule be cut or the fee updates remain frozen as an offset for a delay of the competitive bidding program or as a pay-for for other initiatives under consideration. We are deeply troubled by such a proposal as any cut and/or freeze to the DME fee schedule update will create significant confusion, frustration, and access problems for Medicare beneficiaries and their healthcare providers."
National Association of Chain Drug Stores
Visit our pharmacy / pharmacist section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/108801.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/108801.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Retired VA
posted by James R Handschuh on 3 Jun 2008 at 10:20 amOf course the Chains as well independents do not want bids on durable equipment and Diabetes supplies as it would seriously effect their profits.case in point is the way the VA is able to contain costs on the same products when you do not require bids you enable profiteering. WAKE UP AMERICA JH
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




