Colo. 'Personhood' Ballot Initiative Goes 'Far Beyond' Outlawing Abortions, Editorial Says
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Abortion; Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 05 Jun 2008 - 9:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.6 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
A proposed amendment to the Colorado Constitution that would define a "human egg as a 'person' from the moment of fertilization would go far beyond its intended purpose of outlawing" abortions and should be rejected by state voters in November, a Denver Post editorial says.
According to the Post, by specifying that a fertilized egg is a person even before it is implanted in the uterus means that in vitro fertilization and "forms of birth control that prevent such implantation would be classified as homicide." In addition, some eggs "naturally fail to implant in the uterus," and some that are implanted can result in a miscarriage, the Post reports.
"Should a woman who suffers a miscarriage be charged with negligent homicide because she failed to protect a fertilized egg she may not have even known she carried? Should a man who fertilized an egg be entitled to file a civil lawsuit against a woman who miscarries, charging her with the wrongful death of his week-old fertilized egg?" the editorial asks, adding, "Unfortunately, none of these possibilities is far-fetched," and all "would be almost certain results of the mischievous interaction" of the proposed amendment.
According to the editorial, by "pushing the definition of 'personhood' to fertilization," the measure "creates an absurd and unworkable maze" and "goes far beyond banning abortion and many forms of birth control." The proposed amendment is "legal mischief and should be solidly rejected by the voters in November," the Post concludes (Denver Post, 6/2).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/109986.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/109986.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
A Can Of Worms
posted by Bluestocking on 9 Jun 2008 at 10:39 amIf appearances are anything to go on, the people who proposed this amendment are probably not familiar with anything beyond the most elementary basics of human reproduction -- because if they were, they would know that such an amendment would quite possibly open a *huge* can of worms if it were to be passed.
If a fertilized egg were to be officially declared or regarded as a person in its own right instead of as a *potential* person, then this would at least technically mean that every mother who miscarries a child could be accused of manslaughter at best -- possibly even negligent homicide or even murder.
Such a ruling also fails to address the fact that implantation is at least an equally if not even more vital aspect of pregnancy than is fertilization, since the rate of fertilization to implantation is not only not 100% but actually quite a bit lower.
Finally, such a ruling would also prohibit the use of any and all forms of contraception which prevent implantation but not fertilization -- but then again, that may very well have partly been the intent of those people who have proposed the amendment.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




