Extrafacial Versus Interfacial Nerve-Sparing Technique For Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Main Category: Prostate / Prostate Cancer
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 13 Jun 2008 - 10:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


ORLANDO, FL (UroToday.com) - The University of Chicago group evaluated the pathologic and functional outcomes of the interfacial (IF) and the extrafacial (EF) never sparing (NSP) techniques for the robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP).

Utilizing a prospective data base, functional outcomes were evaluated with the UCLA-PCI (SF-36b2) questionnaire administered pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Among the 1225 consecutive RLRPs performed 95 and 557 men underwent bilateral EF and IF-NSP, respectively. The patients in the EF-NSP group had significantly higher clinical stage and pathologic Gleason score.

The results showed a trend toward higher pathologic staging. The overall positive surgical margin rate was 14% for EF-NSP and 19% for IF-NSP and did not differ between the two groups when stratified by clinical or pathological stage. However, the positive surgical margin rate was significantly higher for the IF group (11%) compared to the EF group (1.2%) on the left side. No significant difference was seen for the right sided positive surgical margin rates.

These investigators hypothesize that the challenge of the left sided dissection by a right handed surgeon and cross siding of the dissecting tools may account of the higher left sided positive surgical margin rate for IF-NSP compared to the EF-NSP.

There was no significant difference in terms of urinary quality of life, although, the sexual function and sexual bother score tended to be better for the IF-NSP group at six months. These observations certainly warrant further evaluation.

Presented by Sergey A. Shikanov, MD, et al., at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) - May 17 - 22, 2008. Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, Florida, USA.

Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Elspeth M. McDougall, MD, FRCSC

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

Copyright © 2008 - UroToday

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Urotoday. "Extrafacial Versus Interfacial Nerve-Sparing Technique For Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 13 Jun. 2008. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111206.php>

APA
Urotoday. (2008, June 13). "Extrafacial Versus Interfacial Nerve-Sparing Technique For Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111206.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Prostate / Prostate Cancer

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Prostate News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Prostate / Prostate Cancer Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »