Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation: Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes With Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 14 Jun 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
ORLANDO, FL (UroToday.com) - Ablative therapies for small renal masses have gained popularity over laparoscopic approaches due to the surgical complexity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Aron and colleagues from the Cleveland Clinic present their 5-10 year oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic renal cryoablation (LRC). Between 09/1997 and 09/2007, they performed renal cryoablation in 288 patients. Of these, 84 patients before 09/2002 had minimum 5-year follow-up.
Follow-up involved MRI imaging on postoperative day 1, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually, with biopsy of the renal lesion at 6-months. In the 84 patients with minimum 5-year follow-up, the mean age was 67 years, 82 patients had a sporadic single renal mass, 6 had multiple lesions, mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (0.9-5.0 cm), median ASA score was III, and mean BMI was 28. Overall, 5 patients developed local recurrence (1 of these had multiple tumors at initial presentation), 2 had local recurrence with metastases, and 7 had distant metastases without local recurrence (1 of these had multiple tumors at initial presentation). Overall, there were 7 cancer deaths, 6 of these in patients with a sporadic single mass at presentation. In the 82 patients with sporadic single renal mass (median follow-up 83 months; range 60-120 months), 5-year actual overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival is 83%, 95%, and 78%, respectively, while 10-year Kaplan-Meier overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival are 57%, 88%, and 51%, respectively.
This is one of the largest long term follow up studies on renal mass cryoablation, and the results thus far appear promising. However, further studies regarding the optimal follow up method for these lesions and the optimal application of the technique still need to be performed.
Moderated by: H. Barton Grossman, MD and Khaled Hafez, MD, at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) - May 17 - 22, 2008. Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, Florida, USA.
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Michael K. Louie, MD
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111211.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111211.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




