Absence Of Viable Carcinoma In Biopsies Performed Greater Than 1-Year Following Radiofrequency Ablation Of Renal Cortical Tumors
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 19 Jun 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4 (1 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
ORLANDO, FL (UroToday.com) - Stern and colleagues report on their experience with tissue biopsy more than 1 year after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small renal masses. The study included 19 patients with 20 renal masses (17 pre-treatment proven RCC and 3 oncocytomas) that had previously undergone RFA ablation, were stable in size on follow-up, and showed no evidence of enhancement on imaging. These lesions were percutaneously biopsied at a mean follow-up of 26.9 (13.1 - 58.0) months. Pathological evaluation, using H&E staining, revealed coagulation necrosis, hyalinization, immune cell infiltration, residual ghost cells, and no evidence of residual viable tumor.
Previous studies reported preserved tumor architecture for several months following RFA; therefore, current findings with longer-term follow up are significant. The biology of tumor-kill following RFA ablation is not clear-cut and deserves research efforts.
Presented by Joshua Stern, MD, Jay D. Raman, MD, and Jeffrey Cadeddu, MD, at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) - May 17 - 22, 2008. Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, Florida, USA.
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Alexander Kutikov, MD
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111872.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/111872.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




