Radical Prostatectomy For Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Matched Comparison Of Retropubic And Robot Assisted Techniques

Main Category: Prostate / Prostate Cancer
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 22 Jun 2008 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (2 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


ORLANDO, FL (UroToday.com) - A group of investigators from the Mayo Clinic assessed peri-operative complications and early oncologic results in a comparative study matching radical retropubic (RRP) and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) groups.

From August 2002 and December 2005, they identified 294 patients undergoing RALP for clinically localized prostate cancer. A comparison RRP group (n=588) from the same period was matched 2:1 for surgical year, age, preoperative PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason grade. Peri-operative complications were compared. Pathologic features were assessed and Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical progression free survival (PFS) were compared.

Peri-operative complications were higher in the RALP group (16.4% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), of which extravasation on cystogram was more common in the RALP group, (9.1% vs. 2.5%, p<0.001). Hospital days were less for the RALP cohort (29.3%, vs. 19.4%, p=0.004, for 1 hospital day). Differences in age, preoperative PSA, pathologic stage, pathologic Gleason grade and margin positivity were not significant between the 2 groups. At one year follow-up there was no significant difference in continence (RALP 91.8%, RRP 93.7%, p=0.344) or potency (RALP 70.0%, RRP 62.8%, p=0.081) rates between the two groups. Three-year biochemical PFS was not different among treatment options (RALP 92.4%, RRP 92.2%; p=0.69).

They conclude that RALP was associated with significantly higher early complication rates compared to RRP; however, there was no difference in long-term continence or potency rates between the two techniques. Furthermore, early oncologic outcomes were similar with no difference in margin positivity or short-term PFS between the two groups.

Presented by Amy E Krambeck, MD, David S DiMarco, MD, Laureano J Rangel, MD, Eric J Bergstralh, MD, Michael L Blute, MD, Matthew T Gettman, MD, at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) - May 17 - 22, 2008. Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, Florida, USA.

Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

Copyright © 2008 - UroToday

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Urotoday. "Radical Prostatectomy For Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Matched Comparison Of Retropubic And Robot Assisted Techniques." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 22 Jun. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112292.php>

APA
Urotoday. (2008, June 22). "Radical Prostatectomy For Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Matched Comparison Of Retropubic And Robot Assisted Techniques." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112292.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Prostate / Prostate Cancer

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Prostate News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Prostate / Prostate Cancer Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »