AG, Immigration Board Should 'Affirm' Rights Of Women Seeking Asylum Because Of Genital Cutting, Editorial Says

Main Category: Women's Health / Gynecology
Also Included In: Sexual Health / STDs;  Public Health
Article Date: 24 Jun 2008 - 10:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


The U.S. has "seldom been shy in lecturing others in the world about human rights abuses," but "it has zigzagged between compassion and confusion in its handling of women seeking refuge from" female genital cutting -- also known as female genital mutilation and female circumcision -- a New York Times editorial says. Given inconsistent court rulings and another case pending, the Times urges "[s]wift action" by Attorney General Michael Mukasey and the Board of Immigration Appeals to affirm the rights of women seeking asylum in the U.S. who have undergone genital cutting.

According to the Times, the case of three Guinean women who had undergone genital cutting "shined a light on the urgent needs for consistent, humane policies." The Guinean women successfully asked a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel to overturn a BIA decision to deny them asylum. According to the Times, the panel said BIA "wrongly assumed" that the women were "safe from future persecution" because "their genitals had already been cut." One of the judges on the panel "wrote separately to underscore" what BIA "failed to recognize: the ritual mutilation of girls to promote chastity and thwart sexual desire is a perpetual injury," the editorial says, adding that genital cutting is "performed without anesthesia, often with dirty instruments, and leads to disfigurement, severe complications and lifelong trauma."

The Times urges Mukasey to "establish clear, consistent refuge policies for women who have suffered such an appalling breach of their basic rights" in light of the pending case of Alima Traore of Mali, now on appeal to the U.S. Circuit Court after BIA rejected her asylum plea using the same "sloppy reasoning" (New York Times, 6/22).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "AG, Immigration Board Should 'Affirm' Rights Of Women Seeking Asylum Because Of Genital Cutting, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 24 Jun. 2008. Web.
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112476.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, June 24). "AG, Immigration Board Should 'Affirm' Rights Of Women Seeking Asylum Because Of Genital Cutting, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112476.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Women's Health / Gynecology

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Women's Health News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Women's Health / Gynecology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »