Total Ankle Replacement With No Metal
Main Category: Arthritis / RheumatologyAlso Included In: Bones / Orthopedics
Article Date: 25 Jun 2008 - 2:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.27 (22 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3.67 (12 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 4 posts |
Patients suffering from severe arthritis now have an option for total ankle replacement that offers increased mobility and pain relief without permanent metal implants. Pioneered by Daniel K. Lee, D.P.M., F.A.C.F.A.S., at UC San Diego Medical Center, this technique is the first in the U.S to offer arthritis sufferers a non-metal, biological ankle replacement.
"Up until now, patients have had two options for replacing their ankle joints: metal implants or fusion of the joints," said Lee, director of foot and ankle surgery at UCSD Medical Center. "Now there is an option that actually restores the ankle with an FDA-approved biologic material that is similar to the collagen found in cartilage."
During a two hour minimally-invasive surgical procedure, Lee, a podiatric foot and ankle surgeon, removes the damaged cartilage around the ankle joint through a four centimeter incision. The collagen material is then molded into the joint where it adapts to the contour of the patient's ankle.
"Unlike a metal device, the advantage to this material is that the implant can be customized in size and contour for every patient's individual need," said Lee. "No matter how the patient's ankle is shaped, the collagen is a perfect fit."
The biologic material, processed from either human or animal collagen sources, has been used for more than 10 years in plastic and abdominal surgery and heart valve replacement. Since it is non-allergenic and sterile in nature, there is no risk of rejection or need for the patient to take immunosupressors.
To allow the material to integrate fully with the ankle joint, a temporary external device is used to stabilize the joint area while keeping it "distracted" or open for a period of 4-6 weeks. Attached by small pins, the cylinder-shaped device serves as a shock system to keep the joint free from friction and movement until healing is complete. The device is then removed entirely, which keeps the patient's ankle free from any metal parts.
"Within 3 weeks after surgery, we see an incorporation of tissue onto the damaged cartilage," said Lee. "The idea here is to avoid fusion of the ankle and to add longevity to the joint. We want to give patients as much mobility as possible so they can get back to the activities they love the most."
Lee's patient's range in age from 30-85. Robert Adams, 82, a retired professor, received the ankle replacement after repeated attempts at physical therapy.
"My ankle collapsed on me," said Adams. "I didn't like the idea of a fusion with no motion or opening up my ankle for a metal device. Following this surgery, I no longer have sharp or stabbing pains. I am continuing to improve and can get around better."
For years, patients have had the option of total joint replacement in the hips, knees, and ankle with titanium and other metal devices. While the implants are well suited for hips and knees, metal replacements for the ankle show a high level of failure and unwanted complications such as metal collapse and breakage. Once an ankle is replaced with metal, options for revision surgery are little to none.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, an estimated 46 million U.S. adults, approximately 1 in 5, report doctor-diagnosed arthritis. As the U.S. population ages, these numbers are likely to increase sharply. The number of adults with arthritis is projected to increase to 67 million by 2030, and a good proportion of U.S. adults will have limited activity as a result. Nearly two-thirds of people with arthritis are younger than 65.
This novel technique for ankle replacement and results of a study will be described in late 2008 in the Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery.
University of California San Diego Health Sciences
200 West Arbor Dr.
San Diego, CA 92103
United States
http://www.ucsd.edu
Visit our arthritis / rheumatology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112629.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/112629.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (4)
Unproven, Experimental Ankle Surgery
posted by Huesero on 14 Jul 2008 at 6:55 pmThis "minimally invasive ankle replacement" is neither.
Patients and practitioners should beware of the high potential for adverse outcome with this procedure.
The author failed to disclose that this is an off lablel use of an limited FDA approved skin graft material that is being placed into the ankle joint like a piece of chewing gum.
It is not minimally invasive as the procedure requires a sizable incision and complete destruction of the remaining joint surface. In addition, a minimum of 4 large metal pins and a bulky external bone clamp fixation device must be applied through the skin into the upper leg bone and heel bone and ankle bone of the recipient. There is high risk of pin tract and joint infections which would effectively prevent a patient from ever being considered for a true prosthetic ankle joint replacement. It also creates stiffness and muscle weakness due to long term immobilization.
This is not a joint replacement, but rather a weak attempt at joint resurfacing with a piece of dead skin tissue. It is not biologic cartilage, but rather promotes scar tissue and foriegn body reaction. The procedure is experimental, unproven, and risky. There are no short, medium or long term follow-ups reported in the literature. The author claims to be preparing for publication in a non-peer reviewed, non-medical podiatry journal, in which there is likely no randomization, no controls, extreme selection bias, low numbers, and short follow-up.
Thank You For This Information
posted by Anon on 3 Feb 2010 at 10:43 amThank you for this information. I wondered why I could not find any more information about this procedure on the Internet. I have had a trimalleolar Fx with dislocation that was openly reduced with 2 plates and 15 screws. The screws had a bit of nickel in them. I am allergic to nickel.
The entire mess was removed, malleoli became mal-union and now I have a sub chondral cyst formation on the lateral talus with complete degeneration of the ankle joint. I am desperate for pain relief without another surgery. I was going to ask about this procedure when I found your comment. Thank you for providing this information.
Jerry
posted by Gerardo G. Creencia on 20 Sep 2010 at 1:26 pmI am at lost to which one to consider for my ankle replacement. but I will keep looking for more information in the internet. Is it the one with metal or the non-metal replacement? I need more information regarding which one is the right one for me. Everyone has the to his own opinion and I am just confused. I think all I need is a foot doctor to explain it to me in detail.
DOES NOT WORK
posted by Carol Fulkerson on 30 Aug 2011 at 6:58 pmIt was a total failure for me.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





