Risk And Predictors Of Prostate Cancer In Men With Negative Repeat Saturation Biopsy
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology
Article Date: 28 Jun 2008 - 8:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (7 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
ORLANDO, FL (UroToday.com) - These investigators sought to determine both the risk of future prostate cancer in patients that undergo negative repeat saturation biopsies and the criteria that should be used in decision making whether to do follow-up biopsy in a patient with a previous negative repeat saturation or not.
They retrospectively evaluated a total of 576 patients with a repeat saturation prostate biopsy from April 2002 to March 2007. The definition of repeat saturation prostate biopsy was patients who had two biopsies or more with at least the last one being a saturation biopsy of 20 cores or more. Their PSA was repeated yearly and repeat biopsy was performed if PSA rose significantly after their last biopsy. They excluded all patients who had a previous positive biopsy for prostate cancer. They analyzed PSA, age, race, number of previous biopsies, number of cores taken, presence of PIN, inflammation, and atypia on pathology specimens, total prostate volume, and digital rectal exam (DRE) results of all patients involved. Differences between outcomes were examined with either the Wilcoxon ran-sum test for continuous variables or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The association between variables and the outcome were expressed as Hazard Ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Patients were followed for a mean of 3.7 months.
Of the 576 patients with repeat saturation biopsies, 386 was negative biopsies (67%). Mean follow-up was 3.8 months. The average age was 64. Out of those 386 patients with negative repeat saturation biopsies 18 (4.7%) developed prostate cancer at some point in the future (cases). However, the majority of patients (95.3%) remained prostate cancer free during our interval follow-up (control group). In a multivariate analysis, only atypia (HR=3.0, p=0.001) and increasing PSA of >1 ng/ml (HR=1.1, p=0.001) were predictors of a future risk of prostate cancer.
Patients with a history of negative saturation biopsy of > 20 cores have a 5% chance of developing prostate cancer in the future. Those patients with increasing PSA > 1 ng/ml and with atypia on their prostate biopsy should be followed more closely as they have a chance of developing future prostate cancer even with a negative repeat saturation biopsy. However, in those patients without these clinical predictors, a negative saturation biopsy decreases the likelihood of future development of prostate cancer. Furthermore, they conclude that saturation biopsy as a repeat biopsy detects almost all significant cancers and obviates the need for future biopsy in a vast majority of men.
Presented by Angelo A Baccala, MD, Ayman S Moussa, MD, Adrian V Hernandez, MD, J Stephen Jones, MD, at the Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association (AUA) - May 17 - 22, 2008. Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, Florida, USA.
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113157.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113157.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




