Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Localized Prostate Cancer In Renal Transplant Patients
Main Category: Urology / NephrologyAlso Included In: Prostate / Prostate Cancer; Transplants / Organ Donations
Article Date: 02 Jul 2008 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
UroToday.com - In the online issue of Urology, Dr. Antonopoulos and colleagues from Brazil present an approach for surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer (CaP) in men who have already undergone renal transplantation.
The protocol was established between August 2004 and November 2007. During that time period 8 men who had undergone renal transplantation were diagnosed with CaP. The cutoff for PSA used to biopsy was 2.5ng/ml; all men underwent 12-core TRUS/biopsy and had a metastatic workup. All these men had retroperitoneal transplantation previously to the iliac vessels with a non-stented Gregoir ureteral reimplantation. They were all on triple drug immunosuppression. All 8 patients had a retropubic prostatectomy (RP) and 7 had pelvic lymphadenectomy, but only on the side opposite the renal transplant. Immunosuppressive medicines were resumed at the same time that diet was advanced. All were discharged to home on the 5th postoperative day.
No major complications occurred. The mean age of these men was 59.6 years and the mean interval between renal transplant and RP was 90 months. Mean operative duration was 183 minutes, mean EBL was 656cc and two obese patients required blood transfusion. The prior renal transplant did not impair the operation or ability to bring the bladder down into the pelvis for the urethral anastomosis. They only modified the ipsilaterial pelvic lymphadenectomy on the renal transplant side. No patient experienced any loss or renal allograft function and with a mean follow-up of 11.9 months, all PSA levels remained undetectable. Six of 8 men achieved full continence.
In summary, RP after renal transplantation is feasible, but only a unilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy on the side opposite the renal allograft is recommended.
Antonopoulos IM, Nahas WC, Piovesan AC, Falci R Jr, Kanashiro H, Alvarez GA, Srougi M
Urology. 2008 May 14. [Epub ahead of print]
doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.03.041
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our urology / nephrology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113555.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113555.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



