Medicare Adds Third Recognized Source To Help Determine Coverage For Anti-Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPAlso Included In: Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 04 Jul 2008 - 4:00 PDT
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced additional updates to the information it uses in determining which drugs may be covered under Medicare Part B when used to treat patients undergoing cancer treatment through chemotherapy.
CMS will add Elsevier Gold Standard's Clinical Pharmacology compendium to the list of Medicare anti-cancer treatment compendia.
"Today's decision completes our review of the compendia requests received earlier this year and we remain committed to this compendia process that allows for updating the Medicare compendia in a transparent way," said CMS Acting Administrator Kerry Weems .
A compendium is a listing of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved drugs and biologics. In some cases, compendia specialize in a particular subset of drugs, such as those used for anti-cancer treatment. Compendia include a summary of how each drug works in the body, as well as information for health care practitioners about proper dosing and whether the drug is recommended or endorsed for use in treating a specific disease.
Medicare local contractors, which process and pay Medicare claims and approve coverage for drugs under Medicare Part B, use compendia as one of several tools to determine whether an anti-cancer drug may be covered under Medicare Part B.
To ensure that Medicare contractors continue to have access to up-to-date drug compendia to make coverage decisions for anti-cancer drugs, CMS created a process to revise its compendia reference list.
This process included the recommendations from CMS' Medicare Evidence Development & Coverage Advisory Committee (MedCAC), which advised CMS on the factors the Agency should consider when updating the list of compendia. The MedCAC recommendations include criteria that a compendium should meet before Medicare includes it as a drug reference guide. These include, among others, a transparent process for evaluating therapies and a process for public identification and notification of potential conflicts of interest of the compendia's parent and sibling organizations, reviewers, and committee members. CMS' compendia-revising process also includes a 30-day public comment period.
Before approving coverage for a drug, Medicare contractors consider whether the drug is FDA approved for use in treating the beneficiary's type of cancer in the beneficiary's specific clinical circumstances. In some instances, however, the medical community may have scientific evidence that supports using a drug to treat a disease even if the drug's FDA-approved label does not include those clinical conditions. In these instances, certain drug compendia may recommend uses beyond those included in the FDA approved labels.
While these changes affect only the compendia CMS uses to make determinations for anti-cancer chemotherapy drugs, CMS also recognizes compendia for determination of covered drugs under Medicare Part D and Medicaid. CMS is interested in updating these lists to include current, well-respected compendia, and is exploring options to do so for these programs.
As part of CMS' comprehensive efforts to review and update the Medicare Part B program, CMS has now approved three national compendia for the program. Earlier this year, CMS approved the NCCN Drugs & Biologics Compendium™ and Thomson Micromedex DrugDex ®.
For more information about these compendium decisions, please visit the CMS website.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113978.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/113978.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Have Conflicts Of Interest Been Resolved With Drugs And Biologics Compendia?
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 7 Jul 2008 at 10:03 amThe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) gave oncologists the okay to begin using three different compendia to justify payment for the off-label use of cancer drugs.
Oncologists who administer cancer chemotherapy drugs to their patients in offices or free-standing facilities receive reimbursement for those drugs plus a small profit under Medicare's Part B program.
Reimbursable drugs include those prescribed off-label as long as they are listed in compendia officially designated by CMS, Medicare's parent agency. Most private insurers follow Medicare's lead when setting their cancer drugs reimbursement policy.
The public knows nothing about the financial relationships between drug companies and the physicians, biostatisticians and other scientists who comprise the panels that write clinical practice guidelines and determine which drugs, indications and weight of evidence that are included in its compendium.
One place where the clinician disparity is most obvious is the delivery of cancer benefits, according to Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former senior official at CMS and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
In a June 24, 2008 Wall Street Journal op-ed piece, he says, "Medicare doesn't have a single oncologist on staff, yet since the year 2000 the program issued, by my count, 165 restrictions and directives on the use of cancer drugs and diagnostic tools."
Now it's a fact that Medicare has radically expanded its authorization for use of cancer drugs by putting off-label decision making in the hands of compendia writers in the private sector, many of whom are on the payrolls of the companies that make the drugs? Hello!
For the war on cancer to progress, the public needs better information about the outcomes from the use of these drugs in very sick and dying patients. CMS should consider requiring physicians to electronically report the outcomes of their chemotherapy regimens, especially when they involve the off-label use of drugs.
Independent epidemiologists and biostatisticians could then have a powerful database for analyzing the outcomes from the use of these drugs. While such analyses will not have the same predictive power as controlled clinical trials, it would give researchers and practicing oncologists valuable insights into what really works and what doesn't when it comes to treating the more than 100 forms of this dreaded disease. Patients' health, and the nation's fiscal health, deserves nothing less.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




