Appeals Court Questions Scope Of Injunction On Wash. State Rules That Require Pharmacists To Dispense EC

Main Category: Women's Health / Gynecology
Also Included In: Pharmacy / Pharmacist;  Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 11 Jul 2008 - 7:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday heard arguments in an appeal of a November 2007 ruling upholding a temporary injunction that prohibited enforcement of a rule adopted by Washington state's Board of Pharmacy last year requiring pharmacies to fill all valid prescriptions, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports (Nyhan, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7/8). A pharmacy owner and two pharmacists are challenging the rule's duty to dispense language, claiming it violates their civil rights. U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Leighton issued the preliminary injunction in November 2007. Leighton in February refused a request by the defendants, including the state Department of Health and the pharmacy board, to lift the injunction (Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 2/20).

On Tuesday, Judge Richard Clifton of the 9th Circuit Court asked if there was a reason not to restrict the injunction only to the plaintiffs in the suit, not pharmacies statewide -- a limitation attorneys for the pharmacists originally sought, the Post-Intelligencer reports. The panel is not expected to rule on the injunction for at least four weeks, according to the Northwest Women's Law Center, which is representing seven people who are asking for the injunction to be lifted. According to Lisa Stone, executive director of the law center, the panel could lift the injunction, narrow Leighton's ruling or preserve the injunction.

Stone said the Law Center is concerned that the injunction could potentially limit access to medications beyond EC that must be used quickly, such as drugs to treat HIV/AIDS. Kristen Waggoner, an attorney for the pharmacy owner and pharmacists, said that the focus of the challenge is on EC, adding that there is no evidence that women are having a difficult time accessing the drug in the state (Nyhan, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7/8).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Appeals Court Questions Scope Of Injunction On Wash. State Rules That Require Pharmacists To Dispense EC." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 11 Jul. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/114648.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, July 11). "Appeals Court Questions Scope Of Injunction On Wash. State Rules That Require Pharmacists To Dispense EC." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/114648.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Women's Health / Gynecology

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Women's Health News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Women's Health / Gynecology Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »