St. Petersburg Times Examines Debate Surrounding Home Births
Main Category: Pregnancy / ObstetricsAlso Included In: Nursing / Midwifery; Primary Care / General Practice; Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 17 Jul 2008 - 8:00 PDT
|
|
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
2.5 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
The St. Petersburg Times on Monday examined the controversy surrounding home births, which has pitted some home birth advocates and physicians against each other. While supporters of home births have "flung phrases like 'father knows best' and 'power play,'" opponents have used "trendy" and "the latest cause celebre," according to the Times.
Last month, the American Medical Association passed a resolution saying it supports state laws that discourage home births; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also opposes the practice. Nevertheless, midwives are pressing for licenses in states that do not allow them to practice. A documentary by former television talk show host Ricki Lake, which looks at the current maternity care system and home births, also has brought attention to the issue, the Times reports.
According to the Times, home birth supporters argue that AMA wants to outlaw home birth and dictate women's delivery choices rather than help them. Steffany Hedenkamp, communications coordinator for the Big Push for Midwives campaign, said, "This is different because now they're targeting consumers," adding, "They're saying, 'We're going to tell you where you can give birth and where you can't.'"
The physician who wrote the AMA resolution said that the debate is not about paternalism, freedom or the comforts of home, the Times reports. Rather, Erin Tracy, an obstetrician at Massachusetts General Hospital and an assistant professor at Harvard University, said, "It's about safety." Tracy also said, "With my own patients, they can have as many people in the room as they want, whatever music, whatever lighting," adding, "But if things go badly, there need to be measures that can be taken to save the life of the mother or the baby."
Risk also is at the center of the debate, the Times reports. A study cited by AMA shows that the death rate for infants born in hospitals is 1.7 per 1,000, compared with 3.5 deaths per 1,000 births for infants born at home. On the other hand, home birth supporters note that women who give birth in hospitals have a significant chance of being given drugs to induce labor or having caesarean sections, which are on the rise in the U.S. Char Lynn Daughtry, founder of Labor of Love Birth Centers, said, "The (induction) drugs are fraught with peril," adding, "It's a safer environment when they're away from the operative tools and the environment of the hospital." Hedenkamp said midwives are more focused on making delivery a positive experience rather than anticipating the worst potential outcome. "Some obstetricians will admit: They're trained in what can go wrong," Hedenkamp said. "They're not trained to be with the women and do whatever they need," she added.
Although physicians ideally would prefer not to do "much of anything at all and just play catcher at the other end," sometimes they "need to intervene and play a more active role," Catherine Lynch, who directs general obstetrics at University of South Florida's College of Medicine, said. According to the Times, home births generally are offered only to women with healthy, low-risk pregnancies, but complications still can occur. Lynch said, "In the hospital, we can get [a] baby out in under five minutes if we need to" (Greene, St. Petersburg Times, 7/14).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/115322.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/115322.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Debate Surrounding Home Births
posted by Anon on 22 Jul 2008 at 10:27 pmThis physician said having a baby in the hospital is about safety and that "With my own patients, they can have as many people in the room as they want, whatever music, whatever lighting,..."
I have worked in the perinatal and postpartum medical field for the last 20 years. I have spent 18 years of that time working in 2 large hospitals. I currently practice at a very large hospital organization. I have watched many trends come and go.
I find the above quote very offensive and condescending and is exactly one of the reasons some women with normal healthy pregnancies choose to birth their own babies at home, rather than to be delivered of their baby by the almighty surgeon.
A "normal healthy" birth is named so because the vast majority of women have them when the normal progression of labor and delivery are not interfered with.
What a stupid and silly little reason to put your baby's life at stake, as that doctor sees it, than to have an annoying number of friends and family at the birth or so that women can play their own music.
If it is about safety, why does the United States have a higher infant mortality rate than Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea or even the Czeck Republic? According the the United Nations the United States is in twenty second place among industrialized countries for infant mortality. This is in spite of the fact that surgeons have been very busy. The CDC says the preliminary results for the cesarean section rate in 2005 is 30.2%. When I entered my profession in 1988 it was 24.7% and was considered out of control then.
In that time I have also seen Family Practice Doctors leave the business of attending births. This is not because they weren't qualified to catch a baby, but because they don't make as much money as a surgeon and the malpractice insurance is too expensive for them to pay.
Many of the dangers that occur during labor and delivery are caused by unnecessary medical interventions in the hospital.
I frequently have to stress to my patients that pregnancy is not a disease. The reason they are having so many ultra sounds and other tests is because of a justified fear of malpractice accusations. Doctors are seldom sued for doing too many tests or providing too many interventions and 75% of all OB/GYN's have been sued. In the majority of those law suits there is no malpractice involved. Yet many medical procedures done on a laboring woman are motivated by "standard of practice" and to protect the physician and hospital legally, not because labor and delivery are inherently dangerous.
However, Americans have been led, perhaps unintentionally, by the medical industry to believe that modern medicine can fix or prevent almost anything. Therefore, when something goes wrong it must be the doctor's fault. This article is a good example when it states, "But if things go badly, there need to be measures that can be taken to save the life of the mother or the baby."
The good Dr.ET need not worry that throngs of women will be leaving the security of the hospital to give birth at home where they can't get an epidural.
However,I would like to know how many times has she gotten down on the floor so that a mother could deliver her baby standing up? How many deliveries has she done in a shower? How many deliveries has she done with a woman on her hands and knees? How many of her patients don't receive an IV just in case it's needed? How many women have their amniotic membrane artificially ruptured then have to be given pitocin because now she must deliver within 24 hours? Does anyone remember Friedman's curve? Pushing should not go on for more than two hours, unless of course there is an epidural that needs to wear off. How many women has she spent the entire 3 hours with while the woman was told to "PUSH!" every few minutes. I can tell you, it is anguish.
Going to have a baby in a hospital is like going to another country where you have been demoted to the age of 6. You are at a psychological disadvantage. They speak a different language and even though you aren't sure what they are exactly talking about you keep quiet to avoid sounding "stupid". They wear a uniform and you are in a night gown that exposes your rear if you get out of bed. They are standing over you as you lay in bed. You feel you must get permission to use the bathroom or have a drink of water. You need them. They don't need you. You are seldom asked for your opinion. You fear that if you become too assertive with your wishes you will offend them. For if you do, someone may write "uncooperative patient" in your chart and they won't give you as much help. If you are there to have a baby, this is just another day at work for them, but it is a significant life event for you. Research shows that women who were made to feel embarrassed during labor would still cry about it 20 years later. They remembered and were affected by how they were treated more than having to endure painful or invasive medical interventions they had not expected.
I will stop here and not go into how hospital births affect the ability of mothers and babies to breastfeed successfully. As long as hospital births continue as they have, those who assist breastfeeding mothers will have great job security.
There are many reasons responsible women who have educated them selves choose to labor and birth at home with midwives than pretty wall paper.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




