28 Sens.' Letter Urges Leavitt To Scrap Draft Rule That Could Limit Birth Control Access
Main Category: Women's Health / GynecologyAlso Included In: Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 25 Jul 2008 - 11:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Twenty-eight senators, including Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), on Wednesday sent a letter to HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt calling on the Bush administration to halt its proposed regulation being developed that "would have the effect of encouraging health care institutions and individuals to refuse to provide birth control to patients who need it," the Oregonian reports. The letter was led by Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and was not signed by any Republicans (Pope, Oregonian, 7/24).
Under the proposal, to receive funding under any program administered by HHS, researchers, clinics, medical schools and hospitals would have to sign "written certifications" that they will not discriminate against people who object to abortion -- however it might be defined. The certification also would be required of state and local governments when allocating grants to hospitals and other institutions that have policies against providing abortions (Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 7/23). According to the Oregonian, the rule would affect more than 500,000 hospitals, clinics and medical facilities that receive federal funding (Oregonian, 7/24).
According to the senators' letter, if the regulation is "published as it presently exists in its draft form," it would effectively "define birth control as abortion and therefore allow individuals and health care corporations to refuse to provide family planning," the letter says. In addition, the proposed regulation would "directly undermin[e] many important state laws" that guarantee contraceptive equity in health insurance plans, and ensure that pharmacists fill women's birth control prescriptions. According to the letter, the rule also could "threaten rape survivors' access to emergency contraception in hospital emergency rooms, and might even prevent women from learning that this option exists" (Senators' letter, 7/23).
Most U.S. residents "agree that increasing access to birth control prevents unintended pregnancies -- and results in fewer abortions," the letter says, adding, "We urge you not to pursue this course of action ... as it would seriously undermine the access of millions of American women to affordable and effective reproductive health care." According to the Oregonian, HHS declined to comment on the letter (Oregonian, 7/24).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our women's health / gynecology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116136.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116136.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
28 Sens.' Letter Urges Leavitt To Scrap Draft Rule That Could Limit Birth Control Access
posted by chris on 26 Jul 2008 at 3:36 pmLess than 5 months until this administration that espouses pre-Enlightenment/Age of Reason thinking from straight out of the Dark Ages (or perhaps, even before) is finished.
Such idiotic thinking is on par with putting Leon Kass at the head of the Presidents Council on Bio Ethics, a person who thinks that all women should be basically human xerox machines, whether they want to or not (and who says that death is a blessing to all individuals "whether they know it or not", to be decided by what "authority"? His or course!).
The truth is that the neo-cons have a problem with humans deciding life issues having to do with control over how many, or especially IF they have children, or how much suffering at the end of life (Leon Kass has stated that "suffering is a great teather", makes one wonder if he would have thought that places like Auschwitz-Birkenau would issue PH.D's! Rediculous logic..Oh, logic, has to do with Reason/Enlightenment!).
This is more evidence of the irrationality of the Bush administrations pandering to the lowest common denominator of civilization.
Isn't the turn away from rational discourse the fashioning of public policy based on narrow, irrational ideas one of the causes that can lead to a new Dark Age?
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




