Get your vitamins from food not pills says American Heart Association
Main Category: Cardiovascular / CardiologyArticle Date: 03 Aug 2004 - 11:00 PST
Research fails to justify routine use of antioxidant (vitamin) supplements to prevent or treat cardiovascular disease, according to an American Heart Association science advisory published in today's issue of Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association.
"At this time, there is little reason to advise that individuals take antioxidant supplements to reduce their risk of cardiovascular disease," said Penny Kris-Etherton, Ph.D., lead author of the association panel, and Distinguished Professor of Nutrition in the Department of Nutritional Sciences at the Pennsylvania State University.
A review of research conducted on antioxidants between 1994 and 2002 showed that antioxidant supplements largely have no effect on preventing or treating cardiovascular disease.
The American Heart Association continues to promote a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, legumes, poultry and lean meats to derive antioxidant vitamin benefits.
"While the research shows that antioxidant supplements have no benefit, the role oxidative stress plays in the development and progression of heart disease has yet to be clarified," Kris-Etherton said. "We still know too little about the oxidative mechanisms in humans and lack biochemical markers with which to evaluate antioxidants."
Ongoing studies should answer important questions about the role of oxidation in atherosclerosis, she said.
Until those questions are resolved, this review presents the current science and helps clinicians understand that they should not recommend antioxidant supplements to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.
"We know that diets high in fruits and vegetables are associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular disease. Thus, following a diet consistent with the American Heart Association's dietary guidelines is recommended. In addition, achieving and maintaining a healthy body weight and being physically active are important to reduce cardiovascular disease risk," Kris-Etherton said.
The antioxidant studies reviewed fell into three headings: no effect on cardiovascular patients, adverse effects on cardiovascular patients, and beneficial effects on cardiovascular patients. The majority of the studies found antioxidants have no effect on cardiovascular patients.
The committee reviewed nine studies on vitamin E and cardiovascular disease (CVD) - five showed the supplement had no effect on CVD events, three showed beneficial effects, and one showed a negative effect. Four studies of beta-carotene were reviewed - three showed no effects on CVD and one showed a negative effect. Five studies of antioxidant "cocktails" were reviewed - two showed no effects and three showed negative effects. Finally, two studies of vitamins E and C together (one with vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol plus slow-release vitamin C and the other with vitamin E plus vitamin C) showed beneficial effects on CVD events.
Most of the patients in the studies reviewed were either heart patients or considered candidates for cardiovascular disease. As such, some patients were taking drugs to treat abnormal lipids and high blood pressure.
Co-authors are Alice H. Lichtenstein, M.D.; Barbara V. Howard, M.D.; Daniel Steinberg, M.D.; and Joseph L. Witztum, M.D.
NR04 - 1292 (Circ/Kris-Etherton)
http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3023709
Visit our cardiovascular / cardiology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/11614.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/11614.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Interesting Choice of Dates
posted by Owen Fonorow on 3 Aug 2004 at 3:22 pmFirst, this advice from the American Heart Association is entirely misguided and will cost countless lives. I was astounded by the claim made in this article (yes, orthodox studies of vitamin C visa vis CVD are few and far between, See Hickey: ASCORBATE: The Science of Vitamin C) but there have been studies. How could Dr. Penny Kris-Etherton have missed them all? I won't list them all here (they are currently posted at http://www.BolenReport.com) but they are mostly after 2002! She also convenietly ignores 80,000 research reports, studies and papers before 1994.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





