House Panel Approves Legislation That Would Invalidate Mandatory Binding Arbitration Provisions Of Nursing Home Admission Contracts
Main Category: Caregivers / HomecareAlso Included In: Seniors / Aging; Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Article Date: 01 Aug 2008 - 5:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() | |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday by a 17-10 vote approved a bill (HR 6126) that would ban the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in nursing home contracts, CQ Today reports (Stern, CQ Today, 7/30). The clauses require that people seeking to enter a nursing home and their family agree to waive their right to take disputes regarding care at the facility to court and must settle them through arbitration. According to CongressDaily, Democrats, who largely support the ban, defeated several amendments from Republicans that sought to cap lawyers' fees and "to weaken the ban on arbitration."
Republicans said that the measure would increase costs for Medicare and Medicaid because many nursing home residents are beneficiaries. Judiciary Committee ranking member Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said that mandatory arbitration was created in the 1990s to quell rising nursing home care costs and that banning it would "set us on the course of returning to the '90s" (Kreisher, CongressDaily, 7/31). Republicans also said that the bill would benefit trial lawyers more than nursing home patients and their families.
Proponents of the measure said mandatory arbitration is appropriate for companies but that individual consumers and their families have little ability to negotiate the terms of the contract prior to signing it (CQ Today, 7/30). Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.), chair of the Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee, said that many people seeking care at a nursing home and their families are unaware or do not understand the terms of the contracts and that they are giving up their right to file suit (CongressDaily, 7/31).
Sanchez said that a letter from HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt indicated that the White House would oppose the measure (CQ Today, 7/30).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our caregivers / homecare section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116905.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116905.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



