AMA Testifies To Senate Judiciary Committee: Opposes Merger Of Pennsylvania's Top Health Insurers

Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 02 Aug 2008 - 2:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


The American Medical Association (AMA) testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in opposition of the proposed merger of Pennsylvania insurers Highmark and Independence Blue Cross (IBC), warning that it amounts to a monopoly and that mergers like this are a threat to health care delivery systems across the country.

"Competition among health insurers leads to more affordable health care for America's patients," said AMA Board Chair, Joseph Heyman, M.D., regarding the AMA's testimony. "The proposed merger in Pennsylvania would have negative long-term consequences for patients, physicians, hospitals and employers and clearance of this merger by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerns us greatly."

The DOJ has challenged only three of more than 400 mergers involving health insurers and managed care organizations over the past 12 years. As a result, markets for third-party payors - mainly commercial insurance plans - have grown increasingly concentrated.

"Contrary to claims of greater efficiencies and lower costs, patients are not benefiting from consolidation in the health insurance market," said Dr. Heyman. "Dominant health insurers have posted historically high profit margins, yet patients see their premiums continue to rise without an expansion of benefits."

The AMA noted that in Pennsylvania, where the market is controlled by Highmark and IBC, there are already high barriers to entry. National health insurers that compete in other parts of the country have barely any presence in Pennsylvania. This is consistent with federal antitrust regulators' observations that national health insurers have been unsuccessful in entering some of the Blue Cross dominated markets. A merger of Highmark and IBC would give the new company a stranglehold on the Pennsylvania insurance market that will further inhibit competition and hurt patients.

"The proposed merger between Highmark and IBC highlights the alarming consolidation trend among health insurers," said Dr. Heyman. "The AMA has long cautioned that this trend is responsible for a growing insurance market imbalance where patients and physicians are left vulnerable to the demands of a few giant health insurers."

American Medical Association

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our health insurance / medical insurance section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
American Medical Association. "AMA Testifies To Senate Judiciary Committee: Opposes Merger Of Pennsylvania's Top Health Insurers." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 2 Aug. 2008. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116965.php>

APA
American Medical Association. (2008, August 2). "AMA Testifies To Senate Judiciary Committee: Opposes Merger Of Pennsylvania's Top Health Insurers." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/116965.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Health Insurance / Medical Insurance

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Health Insurance News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Health Insurance / Medical Insurance Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »