Scottish Study Adds Support For World-Wide Ban On Smoking In Public Places
Main Category: Smoking / Quit SmokingAlso Included In: Respiratory / Asthma
Article Date: 04 Aug 2008 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3.4 (5 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (2 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
NHS Health Scotland, the national health improvement agency, has found a 17 per cent fall in admissions for heart attacks just one year after the smoking ban1 came into force.
Undertaken by the University of Glasgow, this study is one of the most robust of its kind, and was commissioned as part of a national evaluation of the impact of Scotland's smokefree legislation. Published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine, the results from a study of nine Scottish hospitals2 demonstrate the positive impact going smokefree can have on the health of the population.
The evaluation of Scotland's smokefree law found that after the legislation came into force there was:
• a 17 per cent reduction in heart attack admissions to nine Scottish hospitals. This compares with an annual reduction in Scottish admissions for heart attack of 3 per cent per year in the decade before the ban
• an 86 per cent reduction in second-hand smoke in bars
• a 39 per cent reduction in second-hand smoke exposure in 11-year-olds and in adult non-smokers
• an increase in the proportion of homes with smoking restrictions
• no evidence of smoking shifting from public places into the home
• considerable public support for the legislation even among smokers, whose support increased once the legislation was in place
Professor Jill Pell, University of Glasgow who conducted the study said: "Previous analyses of routine hospital admission data from the US and Italy have reported reductions in heart attacks following the introduction of smoking bans. However, our Scottish study, is the first to examine the impact of the legislation on smokers and non-smokers separately. We have been able to demonstrate that two-thirds of the observed reduction in heart attack has occurred in non-smokers and the results of the blood tests confirmed a reduction in exposure to second-hand smoke among non-smokers. We believe that most of the reduction can be attributed to the introduction of the Scottish smoking ban."
Sally Haw, Principal Public Health Adviser at NHS Health Scotland, co-ordinated the research programme: "This evaluation of impact of smokefree legislation is the most comprehensive yet conducted and the findings have exceeded our greatest expectations. As well as the dramatic 17 per cent reduction in heart attacks, we found clear evidence of: improvements in the respiratory health of bar workers; reductions in second-hand exposure in bar workers, and adults and children the general population; and changing socio-cultural norms about smoking and the acceptability of exposing others to SHS.
"The findings from the Scottish study of heart attacks are of worldwide importance and the combined results from the evaluation provide a compelling case for other countries to implement a comprehensive ban on smoking in public places as soon as possible, thereby reducing the harm caused by second-hand smoke. However, it is essential that smokefree legislation is set within the context of wider tobacco control activity as outlined in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control - an international treaty designed to reduce both the demand for and the supply of tobacco products. 3"
Deputy Chief Medical Officer Professor Peter Donnelly said: "This raft of research demonstrates the significant public health benefits that the smoking ban is already having in Scotland. It provides evidence that the legislation is improving the health of everyone in Scotland - including smokers, non-smokers, children and barworkers. One of the most important findings is the reduction in heart attacks. We believe that the smoking ban was a large contributory factor to this drop and I am confident that we will continue to see the positive effects of the ban in years to come."
The publication of this study comes together with other good news internationally; Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Bill Gates announced in New York last week a further $375 million investment ($250 million from the Bloomberg Family Foundation and $125 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) in tobacco control activity in developing countries4; while China has made the forthcoming Olympics a smokefree event when it takes the world stage in August.
1. The Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act came into force in Scotland on 26th March 2006 and prohibits smoking in virtually all enclosed public places including bars restaurants and cafes.
2. The heart attack admissions to the nine study hospitals account for 63 per cent of all Scottish admissions for heart attack.
3. Link to WHO FCTC
4. Link to Bloomberg/Gates story
NHS Scotland
http://www.scot.nhs.uk
Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/117070.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/117070.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
More Junk Science
posted by Dave Atherton on 4 Aug 2008 at 10:31 amI will leave it up to in the first instance to Amanda Sandford of ASH to point out the junk ASH in her letter to the New Scientist magazine.
"ASH (UK) endorses your conclusion that bad science can never be justified. ASH, unlike some organisations, has never asserted that a single 30-minute exposure to second-hand smoke is enough to trigger a heart attack, and we are not aware of any UK health advocates who have done so. "
There was a similar study done in Helena, Montana by Stanton Glantz claiming a 40% reduction, here is a response from Professor Henry F Mizgala, Emeritus Professor of Medicine University of British Columbia in the Brtish Medical Journal. I am afraid this is more in hope than fact smoking bans lead to less heart attacks.
"Dear Sirs,
I am truly amazed that a study of such poor quality was not only accepted for publication in a journal with the reputation of the BMJ but was accorded widespread coverage in the lay press as having actually been published as a peer reviewed article in the print version of the journal dated April 5. This is, in my opinion, gross misrepresentation designed to provide maximal public impact in furthering the biased and unscientific opinions of these authors.I have always assumed that submissions to BMJ would undergo rigorous peer review in regard to content, methodology and correctness of statistical analysis. This so called study does not even come close to meeting the basic criteria of a properly executed scientific study."
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns...
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/328/7446/977#55801
Smoking Sucks
posted by Margaret Fullmore on 4 Aug 2008 at 8:05 pmSmoking is a mug's game. To defend such a stupid pastime beggars belief - unless, of course, money is to be made. Money makes the world go round!!
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






