Myths And Facts About DEET
Main Category: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / VirusesAlso Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 15 Aug 2008 - 2:00 PDT
West Nile virus is present in almost every corner of our country and this is the peak season. A new analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on U.S. West Nile virus cases in 2007 found that most (89%) of the 3,630 cases were reported during July, August and September. All but six states reported cases of WNV infections in humans last year. The CDC says the mosquito-borne disease is underreported and under-diagnosed and estimates that approximately 175,000 Americans may have been infected with West Nile last year. There are at least 44 confirmed cases of WNV across 15 states so far this year.
The CDC and state and local public health agencies nationwide recommend the use of EPA-registered insect repellents to help protect against West Nile virus. The most popular of these recommended repellents is DEET, which is used by at least one-third of Americans every year. Despite its popularity, or perhaps because if it, many myths persist about DEET.
Myth: No more than 10% DEET should be used on children. Fact: Federal regulators say that all concentrations can be used by people of all ages when label directions are followed. The American Academy of Pediatrics says products containing up to and including 30 percent DEET can be used on children two months of age and older. The AAP also says that products containing DEET are among the most effective repellents available and should be used when necessary to protect against bites from insects and ticks that may carry disease.
Myth: Some popular skin creams and "natural" repellent products are safer than DEET. Fact: "DEET has been shown to be an extremely safe and effective repellent," said Lyle R. Petersen, M.D., director of the CDC's division of vector-borne infectious diseases. University of Florida scientists Jonathan Day and Roxanne Rutledge wrote: "Natural is a word that is sometimes used to promote 'safe' products. Unfortunately, the wording can be misleading for the uninformed individual. 'Natural' products are usually essential oils distilled from plants… These oils can be toxic and irritating in high concentrations. 'Natural' repellents are not necessarily safe repellents." DEET is one of the most widely tested consumer products of any type and has been used reliably by consumers for more than 50 years. According to a New England Journal of Medicine article (Fradin & Day, 2002), DEET "has a remarkable safety profile."
Myth: Garlic, bananas and vitamin-B ward off mosquitoes. Fact: "There is no scientific evidence that eating garlic, vitamins, onions, or any other food will make a person repellent to mosquitoes," said Day and Rutledge of the University of Florida. "It is also unlikely that B-1 skin patches will work either," Day says. DEET is regarded as the "gold standard" against which other repellents are tested.
Myth: New devices are effective against mosquitoes. Fact: "There is no evidence that wearing devices that emit sound will repel mosquitoes," say Day and Rutledge. "Bug zappers do not control mosquitoes and can reduce the populations of beneficial insects," says Ken Gioeli, University of Florida natural resource agent. Some experts suggest that zappers actually attract mosquitoes to your property.
Myth: Dryer sheets and other home remedies repel bugs. Fact: "The truth is although many home remedies and oddball uses of everyday products do serve to repel mosquitoes somewhat, they don't work very effectively for very long," writes Barbara Mikkelson on the popular Web site, www.snopes.com.
Myth: DEET is smelly and oily. Fact: Fifty years of product development has yielded DEET-based products that are pleasant to use they have a pleasant "feel" on the skin and fresh fragrances. Some even go on as a dry formulation similar to spray deodorant that is powder-like.
Myth: Higher concentrations mean better protection. Fact: Higher concentrations of DEET mean longer protection, not better. A 5% product will provide about 90 minutes of protection and a 100 % product protects for about 10 hours. Protection time increases as the concentration increases. So, the longer you are outside, the higher the concentration you should use. However, protecting against ticks requires at least 20% DEET, and no other repellent works as well against ticks.
Most folks who are going outside for a backyard barbecue should choose a product that protects them for up to two hours, a repellent in the 10% range. It's often fine to use a concentration below 30% for most outdoor activities. When you are exposed for long periods to hoards of mosquitoes, though, a 100% product is advisable.
Myth: I don't need repellent unless I'm headed out into a wooded or waterfront location. Fact: Mosquitoes can be anywhere, even in a city, and many carry disease. Most people who have contracted WNV were bitten by mosquitoes lurking in their own yards. Cases of malaria have occurred in recent years in Washington, D.C. And other mosquito-borne diseases sometimes occur elsewhere in the United States.
Myth: DEET is an insecticide. Fact: DEET does not kill mosquitoes, as insecticides do. It repels them by confusing their ability to locate humans.
Myth: DEET causes seizures in children. Fact: Scientific reviews do not show a causal relationship between DEET and seizures (Murphy, et al, 1997; Bell, et al, 2002). This myth stems from a handful of isolated reports in both adults and children that cannot be definitively linked to DEET. Experts report that two percent of typical children have one or more seizures from unknown causes by age 10. A multi-year review of adverse events yielded a handful of neurological cases (given millions of product uses per year) that could not be tied to use of DEET-based repellents. These neurological adverse events were not more common in children than in other age groups and were not tied to concentration of DEET in the products.
Myth: Some popular skin creams and "natural" repellents work as well as DEET. Fact: Scientifically controlled studies show very few repellents are effective as DEET (Fradin & Day, 2002). The CDC urges consumers to pick only repellents with EPA registrations to assure appropriate efficacy. The most effective, according to the CDC, are DEET, picaridin, oil of lemon eucalyptus (recommended with limitations) and IR3535 (http://www.cdc.gov).
Kroeger Associates
11415
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
United States
http://www.kroegerpr.com
Visit our infectious diseases / bacteria / viruses section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118322.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118322.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Promising WNV Rx Since 2003
posted by Dave Moskowitz MD FACP on 15 Aug 2008 at 10:38 amGenoMed, has had encouraging results treating West Nile virus encephalitis since 2003.
We’ve had 82% treatment success rate in people (23 of 28 improved), 75% in horses (6 of 8 survived), and 50% in birds (6 of 12 survived). Our first 8 human WNV patients were published in a peer-reviewed medical journal in 2004 (1). This is sufficient for our treatment to officially exist in both the medical and legal senses, regardless of what the CDC does (or doesn’t) say.
We’ve seen that the earlier the treatment is begun, the better the outcome, so public education is absolutely critical—literally, the difference between life and death.
Anybody who wants to download our WNV trial protocol can do so for free at any time by clicking on the "West Nile trial" link on our company’s homepage at http://www.genomed.com.
Dave Moskowitz MD
CEO & Chief Medical Officer
GenoMed, Inc. (Ticker symbol GMED on OTC Pink Sheets)
http://www.genomed.com
“The public health company™”
1. Moskowitz DW, Johnson FE. The central role of angiotensin I-converting enzyme in vertebrate pathophysiology. Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4(13):1433-54. PMID: 15379656 (For PDF file, click on paper #6 at: http://www.genomed.com/index.cfm?action=investor&drill=publications)
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




