Comparing Intermittent To Continuous Androgen Deprivation For Advanced Prostate Cancer

Main Category: Prostate / Prostate Cancer
Also Included In: Urology / Nephrology;  Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 16 Aug 2008 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:4 and a half stars

4.5 (4 votes)

Healthcare Prof:3 stars

3 (1 votes)


UroToday.com - Dr. Arto Salonen and Finnish colleagues compared intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) to continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in 856 patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (CaP) treated at 27 clinics in Finland. This report represents an interim analysis of their data.

The patients were accrued between 1997 and 2003 and had a life expectancy of at least 12 months. A 24 week run in of continuous LHRH agonist therapy preceded randomization for those who had a PSA decrease to <10.0ng/ml, or at least 50% if the baseline value at the initial visit was <20.0ng/ml. Patients were then randomized to IAD or continuous therapy.

Mean patient age was 72 years and mean PSA at entry was 383ng/ml. Patients had stage T3 tumors (61%) and stage T4 tumors (29%). A total of 564 men completed the run-in period and 279 were randomized to IAD and 285 to CAD. PSA, alkaline phosphatase, proportion of T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, metastatic disease, and skeletal hot spots among patients with M1 disease were significantly higher in the IAD group. Baseline testosterone was not significant in the analysis.

A significant proportion of patients with the most aggressive and advanced CaP did not respond to androgen deprivation therapy. The investigators concluded that IAD appears feasible for patients with locally advanced, hormone sensitive CaP. A low limit of testosterone at baseline did not select for IAD or CAD. Patients with advanced CaP, with a high PSA, alkaline phosphatase and metastatic disease, with more than 5 skeletal hot spots, did not show adequate biochemical response to ADT. Thus, they are not good candidates for IAD and other modalities should be considered.

Salonen AJ, Viitanen J, Lundstedt S, Ala-Opas M, Taari K, Tammela TL
J Urol. 2008 Jul 15. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.009

Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS

UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.

To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com

Copyright © 2008 - UroToday

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
Urotoday. "Comparing Intermittent To Continuous Androgen Deprivation For Advanced Prostate Cancer." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 16 Aug. 2008. Web.
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118333.php>

APA
Urotoday. (2008, August 16). "Comparing Intermittent To Continuous Androgen Deprivation For Advanced Prostate Cancer." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118333.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Prostate / Prostate Cancer

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Prostate News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Prostate / Prostate Cancer Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »