Comparing Intermittent To Continuous Androgen Deprivation For Advanced Prostate Cancer
Main Category: Prostate / Prostate CancerAlso Included In: Urology / Nephrology; Cancer / Oncology
Article Date: 16 Aug 2008 - 0:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.5 (4 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
UroToday.com - Dr. Arto Salonen and Finnish colleagues compared intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) to continuous androgen deprivation (CAD) in 856 patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (CaP) treated at 27 clinics in Finland. This report represents an interim analysis of their data.
The patients were accrued between 1997 and 2003 and had a life expectancy of at least 12 months. A 24 week run in of continuous LHRH agonist therapy preceded randomization for those who had a PSA decrease to <10.0ng/ml, or at least 50% if the baseline value at the initial visit was <20.0ng/ml. Patients were then randomized to IAD or continuous therapy.
Mean patient age was 72 years and mean PSA at entry was 383ng/ml. Patients had stage T3 tumors (61%) and stage T4 tumors (29%). A total of 564 men completed the run-in period and 279 were randomized to IAD and 285 to CAD. PSA, alkaline phosphatase, proportion of T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, metastatic disease, and skeletal hot spots among patients with M1 disease were significantly higher in the IAD group. Baseline testosterone was not significant in the analysis.
A significant proportion of patients with the most aggressive and advanced CaP did not respond to androgen deprivation therapy. The investigators concluded that IAD appears feasible for patients with locally advanced, hormone sensitive CaP. A low limit of testosterone at baseline did not select for IAD or CAD. Patients with advanced CaP, with a high PSA, alkaline phosphatase and metastatic disease, with more than 5 skeletal hot spots, did not show adequate biochemical response to ADT. Thus, they are not good candidates for IAD and other modalities should be considered.
Salonen AJ, Viitanen J, Lundstedt S, Ala-Opas M, Taari K, Tammela TL
J Urol. 2008 Jul 15. Epub ahead of print.
doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.009
Reported by UroToday.com Contributing Editor Christopher P. Evans, MD, FACS
UroToday - the only urology website with original content written by global urology key opinion leaders actively engaged in clinical practice.
To access the latest urology news releases from UroToday, go to: www.urotoday.com
Copyright © 2008 - UroToday
Visit our prostate / prostate cancer section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118333.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/118333.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




