Dietary Supplements For Horses, Dogs And Cats Need Better Regulation

Main Category: Veterinary
Also Included In: Regulatory Affairs / Drug Approvals
Article Date: 23 Aug 2008 - 1:00 PDT

email to a friend   printer friendly   opinions  

The growing use of animal dietary supplements has raised several concerns, including the safety of specific supplements and the approaches taken to determine their safeness. A new National Research Council report, requested by the Center for Veterinary Medicine of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, assesses whether the addition of three dietary supplements -- lutein, evening primrose oil, and garlic -- to the diets of horses, dogs, or cats may cause significant adverse health effects.

The committee that wrote the report concluded that because of inadequate data, it could not clearly define a safe upper limit for lutein, evening primrose oil, or garlic, but it could cite historical safe intakes (HSI) and estimate presumed safe intakes (PSI) based on available research findings. The committee added that current regulations addressing animal dietary supplements are in "disarray."

The report stresses that clear and precise regulations need to be established so "only safe animal dietary supplements are allowed on the market." An improved adverse event reporting system for animal dietary supplements would help, because existing systems have various deficiencies, including limited public access, passive rather than active solicitation of adverse events, and unclear discrimination of minor versus serious adverse events.

Additionally, the "generally recognized as safe" designation used for both human and animal ingredients is helpful in determining safe intake levels, but safety in humans does not guarantee safety in animals, the committee noted. For example, excess garlic intake can cause hemolytic anemia in horses, dogs, and cats, but this adverse effect has not been reported in humans.

The passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) in 1994 amended the way in which dietary supplements for humans are regulated, but FDA concluded that DSHEA should not apply for animals. As such, animal dietary supplements are typically regulated as "food" without the special consideration afforded to supplements marketed for humans. The Association of American Feed Control Officials also sanctions the ingredients used in animal feeds, which states typically use as guidelines, but it does not dictate minimum or maximum amounts of nutrients allowed in a product.

The daily PSI and HSI, given in milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg BW), determined by the committee for the three dietary supplements are:

LUTEIN

• For horses, the PSI is 8.3 mg/kg BW when obtained from forage or natural sources; no data exist to support recommendations regarding supplements.
  
  
• For dogs, the PSI is 1.8 mg/kg BW, with an HSI of 0.45 mg/kg BW.
  
  
• For cats, the PSI is 7.2 mg/kg BW, with an HSI of 0.85 mg/kg BW.

EVENING PRIMROSE OIL

• For horses, the PSI is 400 mg/kg BW, which assumes the intake of total fat will not exceed 23 percent of the diet, including any quantity of evening primrose oil added.
  
  
• For dogs, the PSI is 424 mg/kg BW, which is the upper level used in clinical trials. Most likely the upper safe intake is higher than this.
  
  
• For cats, the PSI is 391 mg/kg BW. It is also likely that cats could tolerate higher levels.

GARLIC

• For horses, the PSI is 90 mg/kg BW, with an HSI of 15 mg/kg BW.
  
  
• For dogs, the PSI is 56 mg/kg BW; garlic has a long history of safe use as a supplement, with mean levels of 22 mg/kg BW being reported without serious adverse events.
  
  
• For cats, there are insufficient data to support a generic recommendation that covers all garlic preparation types, and the committee was not able to establish a PSI of garlic for cats. However, mean intake levels of 17 mg/kg BW have been reported with apparently no serious adverse events.

###

The study was sponsored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council make up the National Academies. They are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering. A committee roster follows.

Copies of SAFETY OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR HORSES, DOGS, AND CATS are available to purchase from the National Academies Press on the Internet at HTTP://WWW.NAP.EDU.

[ This news release and report are available at HTTP://NATIONAL-ACADEMIES.ORG ]

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
Division on Earth and Life Studies
Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources

COMMITTEE ON EXAMINING THE SAFETY OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS FOR HORSES, DOGS, AND CATS

JIM E. RIVIERE (CHAIR)
Burroughs Wellcome Fund Distinguished Professor of Pharmacology, and
Director of Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and Pharmacokinetics
College of Veterinary Medicine
North Carolina State University
Raleigh

DAWN M. BOOTHE
Professor and Director
Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory
College of Veterinary Medicine
Auburn University
Auburn, Ala.

GAIL L. CZARNECKI-MAULDEN
Senior Research Nutritionist
Nestle Purina PetCare PTC
St. Louis

DAVID A. DZANIS
Owner
Dzanis Consulting and Collaborations
Santa Clarita, Calif.

PATRICIA A. HARRIS
Senior Equine Nutritionist
Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition
Leicestershire, England

WOUTER H. HENDRICKS
Head and Chair
Animal Nutrition Group
Wageningen Agricultural University
Wageningen, Netherlands

CLAUDIA A. KIRK
Associate Professor
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences
University of Tennessee
Knoxville

LORI K. WARREN
Assistant Professor
Department of Animal Sciences
University of Florida
Gainesville

RESEARCH COUNCIL STAFF

AUSTIN J. LEWIS
Study Director

RUTH S. ARIETI
Research Associate

Source: Jennifer Walsh
National Academy of Sciences

• Additional
• References
• Citations