Michigan Board Approves Stem Cell Measure For November Ballot
Main Category: Stem Cell ResearchAlso Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 26 Aug 2008 - 6:00 PDT
The Michigan Board of State Canvassers on Thursday certified a ballot measure that would loosen Michigan's restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research, the Detroit Free Press reports (Bell, Detroit Free Press, 8/22). The board found the group Cure Michigan submitted nearly 500,000 signatures backing the proposal, which were 100,000 more than the required minimum to place a proposal on the ballot in the state (Heinlein, Detroit News, 8/22).
The official wording of the ballot measure says that it will expand use of human embryos for any research permitted under federal law subject to the following limits: the embryos are created for fertility treatment purposes; are not suitable for implantation or are in excess of clinical needs; would be discarded unless used for research; were donated by the person seeking fertility treatment; provide that stem cells cannot be taken from human embryos more than 14 days after cell division begins; prohibit any person from selling or purchasing human embryos for stem cell research; and prohibit state and local laws that prevent, restrict or discourage stem cell research, future therapies and cures (AP/MLive.com, 8/21).
Joe Schwarz -- a physician and former Republican member of Congress who heads the Cure Michigan campaign -- said, "What we are talking about here is providing cures for people, providing therapies for people. In this century, a majority of therapies and cures will be from genetic therapy and cellular therapy and not from popping chemical compounds, which is what we've done all our lives. So this is a movement forward" (Martin, AP/MLive.com, 8/21). Critics of the proposal have opposed it on religious and moral grounds. David Doyle, a spokesperson for Michigan Citizens Against Unrestricted Science and Experimentation, said the initiative would undo a 1978 law banning the destruction of human embryos and leave in question a 1998 law prohibiting human cloning. "It goes too far, has too many loopholes and would allow unlimited experimentation on human embryos," Doyle said (Detroit News, 8/22).
According to the Detroit News, proponents and opponents of the measure are expected to spend a combined $20 million or more on their campaigns (Detroit News, 8/22).
Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.
© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.
Visit our stem cell research section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119277.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119277.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Biased Language
posted by Mary on 26 Aug 2008 at 9:03 amWhy say the stem cell proposal would "loosen Michigan's restrictions" when the proposal itself says 'prohibit state and local laws'?
This proposal is already outside outside internationally recognized research standards for human embryonic stem cell research. Whether it's the International Society for Stem Cell Research, the National Academies of Sciences, or virtually every bioethics board in the world, their restrictions are greater than the proposal's.
Canada's guidelines were established, in part, "to ensure that research done in Canada will be as respected as that done in the rest of the world".
But, instead of allowing us to comply with guidelines set around the world, we would turn stem cell research, unregulated, to the pharmaceutical and biotech big businesses.
Sets and ugly precedent.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





