Abstinence-Only Program Ineffective, Not Worth The Federal Money, Editorial Says

Main Category: Sexual Health / STDs
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;  Public Health
Article Date: 26 Aug 2008 - 8:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

4.8 (5 votes)

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


"[P]ro-choice, pro-family planning" Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) is in "danger of legitimizing the ethical fraud of abstinence-only education" if he accepts federal abstinence education grants to be distributed by the state Department of Health and Human Services, a Philadelphia Daily News editorial says. According to the Daily News, Pennsylvania has not accepted federal funding for abstinence-only education since 2003, but the state Health Department is preparing an application for about $1.7 million in grants this year. In a statement, Rendell acknowledged the "limited effectiveness" of these programs, but said it's important to teach abstinence and does not want to "stand in the way" of groups using the funding, according to the editorial.

However, "every legitimate scientific study" of abstinence-only education has found that these programs do "more harm than good," the editorial says, adding that the programs provide "medically inaccurate" information by mentioning contraceptive methods "only to say that they fail, not that they protect against pregnancy" and sexually transmitted infections. Most of the $1.5 billion the federal government has spent on abstinence-only programs in the past 10 years has gone to faith-based organizations "because ethical educators and health professionals won't have anything to do with these programs," the Daily News says. If Pennsylvania applies for funding for the abstinence-only programs, "it would be saying it's OK for our kids to get inaccurate and dangerous misinformation, as long as somebody else tells the lies," the editorial says, concluding, "These discredited programs are just the kind that a pro-choice, pro-family planning Democratic governor should want to stand in the way of" (Philadelphia Daily News, 8/22).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our sexual health / stds section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Abstinence-Only Program Ineffective, Not Worth The Federal Money, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 26 Aug. 2008. Web.
14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119279.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, August 26). "Abstinence-Only Program Ineffective, Not Worth The Federal Money, Editorial Says." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119279.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Sexual Health / STDs

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Sexual Health News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Sexual Health / STDs Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »