Upping The Tax On Premixed Spirits - A Step In The Right Direction?
Main Category: Alcohol / Addiction / Illegal DrugsAlso Included In: Nutrition / Diet; Public Health
Article Date: 30 Aug 2008 - 0:00 PDT
Whilst the Australian government should be applauded for increasing the tax on premixed spirits, the authors of a Comment in this week's edition of The Lancet say it should be part of a battery of strategies to reduce both binge and excessive drinking.
Dr Christopher Doran and Dr Anthony Shakeshaft, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, discuss the possible effects of the 70% increase in excise duty on premixed spirits brought in by the Australian Government in April 2008, from AU$39.36/L to $66.67/L.
They say: "The excise increase raises the question about whether consumers of premixed spirits will simply switch their preferences to purchasing unmixed spirits or cheaper beverages. Across the whole population, switching to unmixed spirits is unlikely to be a major issue, because even if all current drinkers of premixed spirits switched to unmixed, they would still comprise a small market share (about 30%) relative to beer drinkers (about 66%)." Further, they add that young people are particularly unlikely to switch to cheaper beverages, since spirits are the drink of choice among the 45% of 16-17-year-olds who drink in Australia, despite such drinks being the most expensive per litre of alcohol.
In conclusion, the authors say that while the Australian government should be applauded for this step in the right direction, overall rates of usual or binge drinking in Australia are unlikely to fall due to the small overall market share of spirits (see table in full Comment). They say: "This conclusion does not indicate, however, that the government's decision was wrong - going part of the way is not the same as going the wrong way. The principle of a standardised tax rate is sound, and governments have a clear role to proactively improve public health."
The government should, they say, combine taxation issues with other supply and demand initiatives. They conclude: "The government could adopt a battery of strategies, such as the provision of incentives to encourage manufacturers to market mid-strength and low-strength beer, the imposition of restrictions on the availability of drinks with a high alcohol content, and more effective regulation of advertising codes of practice."
"Upping the tax on premixed spirits - a step in the right direction"
Dr Christopher Doran and Dr Anthony Shakeshaft
The Lancet, Volume 372, Number 9640, 30 August 2008
Click here to view full text (login required)
The Lancet
Visit our alcohol / addiction / illegal drugs section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119692.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/119692.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Price Hikes Alone Are Not The Answer.
posted by Peter O'Loughlin on 31 Aug 2008 at 5:54 amGiven the UK's Government propensiity to tax everything and everyone in as many ways as it can think of, especially motorists, one wonders why they have been so reluctant to make any substantial increases in tax on alcohol. More so when one considers the evidence from Switzeraland and Finland which clearly establishes that it is not the so called hardened, or heavy drinkers who make the biggest demands on the NHS services through alcohol related hospital admissions, but 'moderate drinkers' who occasionally drink too much.
One way of cutting demand is to make alcohol less available and less enticing. Sadly the UK Government takes the opposite view since unlike smoking, it has made it clear that it has no intention of curtailing advertising, and rather than making alcohol less available, it has gone to extreme measures in increasing its availability. Indeed in it's so called 'Safe, Sensible and Sociable' document on alcohol, it constantly reiterates the need to promote 'sensible drinking' a contrdiction in terms because the first organ of the body attacked by alcohol is the brain. Even after just one drink the control and judgement centres of the brain are adversley affected, thus 'Safe Sensible and Sociable' is not the likely outcome.
Questions from this writer to the relevant ministers requesting information as to how much input the alcohol drinks industry had into the contents of the above documentremain unanswered.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.






