$8.5 Billion Extra Payments To Medicare Advantage Plans In 2008
Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIPArticle Date: 08 Sep 2008 - 1:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
5 (4 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 2 posts |
Private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans will be paid an average 12.4 percent more per enrollee in 2008 compared to what the same enrollee would have cost in the traditional Medicare fee-for-service program, according to a new report from The Commonwealth Fund. Even if the payment reductions to MA plans mandated by the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA) - scheduled to take effect beginning in 2010 - had been fully in place in 2008, MA plans still would have been paid 10.6 percent more than expected fee-for-service costs.
In the report, Brian Biles, professor of health policy at George Washington University, and colleagues estimate that extra payments to MA plans will amount to $986 over fee-for-service costs for each of about 8.7 million Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, for a total of more than $8.5 billion in 2008 - up from $3.9 billion in extra payments, or $795 per MA enrollee in 2004. Extra payments to MA plans between 2004 and 2008 will total nearly $33 billion.
The bulk of these extra payments were mandated by the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, which was intended to expand the role of private plans in Medicare in an effort to reduce growth in Medicare spending. Since 2004, MA plan enrollment has increased from 4.8 million to the current 8.7 million.
"The legislation passed this year only partially addresses the overpayment problem in Medicare Advantage, and private plans still substantially raise the cost of serving Medicare beneficiaries," said Commonwealth Fund President Karen Davis. "Policymakers should carefully examine whether extra payments to Medicare Advantage plans are the best use of dollars for the beneficiaries the program is designed to serve."
The authors of the report, The Continuing Cost of Privatization: Extra Payments to Medicare Advantage Plans in 2008, note that eliminating extra payments to private plans could be used for other purposes, such as offsetting the costs of Medicare policy improvements, which may include: slowing the increase in the Part B premium that Medicare beneficiaries pay, increasing eligibility for low-income subsidies in Medicare, or improving benefits and financial security for all beneficiaries.
"Medicare Advantage was intended to save the program money through the use of private plans. However, extra payments to these plans combined with rapidly increasing enrollment, has resulted in $33 billion in additional spending over the past five years," said Biles. "These overpayments put pressure on both Medicare and the federal budget, drain resources from other, potentially more productive, uses, and dilute the incentive for Medicare Advantage plan efficiency - which was one of the original reasons for including a private plan option in Medicare."
###
The Commonwealth Fund is a private foundation supporting independent research on health policy reform and a high performance health system.
Source: Mary Mahon
Commonwealth Fund
Visit our medicare / medicaid / schip section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/120601.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/120601.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (2)
Only Half The Story: MA Plans Bundle Benefits Medicare Doesn't Offer
posted by Charlie on 1 Oct 2008 at 12:24 pmIn my opinion, this article is irresponsibly written as their is a significant half of the story omitted. The two points that should be included are: 1) Plans are required to reimburse Medicare 25% of the difference between their bid and the benchmark and 2) These MA Plans complete by including benefits Medicare doesn't offer.
The overpayment built into the Medicare Modernization Act relates to the amount Medicare reimburses plans dependent on their bids. For sake of brevity, every plan receives only 75% of the difference between the Medicare-established benchmark and the amount the plans bid to reflect their anticipated cost. Again, it gets very complicated, but these plans are prospectively reimbursed for what Medicare anticipates will be the cost of treatment down the road. In the meantime, the plans must front the money to providers on the hope that not only Medicare will reimburse correctly, but that the member will remain enrolled in the plan to be eligible to receive the reimbursement. Last year, so many plans had discrepancies with Medicare that a large-scale enrollment reconciliation process finally determined which plans would be reimbursed for many members.
The second point not mentioned is the fact that these MA Plans bundle benefits Medicare doesn’t offer - offsetting much of these over payments. As these plans continue to compete, the benefits get richer. A look at the 2009 benefits released today by all plans includes enhanced Prescription Drug Benefits, Dental, Hearing, Vision, Wellness/Diet Education, Gym memberships, Transportation and Over-The-counter stipends among others. These represent significant costs that allow a plan to compete in the market.
While not every plan spends these "overpayment" dollars the same - that's the point. A Medicare beneficiary gets to choose among the mix of options they'd prefer in a setting that is created to support this population. With the conditions of the members being the overriding determinant of reimbursement levels, these plans aren't avoiding the sickest members - they're trying to enroll them and keep them healthy thanks to the Risk Adjustment system. So much of the residuals of the taxpayer dollars are omitted in what seems to be a very biased article. As a cynical consumer, I abhor pork-barrel spending, but as a person in the industry, I'm informed- and need to share this.
For Profit Non-Medicare Insurance Plans
posted by Judy on 2 Oct 2008 at 10:19 amMost Commercial insurance plans are "for profit" insurance companies. They have stock traded over the counter and need to pay dividends to their stock holders. Also, advertising is expensive and CEO's/administrators have to be well paid.
Across the private insurance industry these administrative expenses take up about 25 - 30 percent of the premium payment, Medicare administrative expenses are far less - 3 to 4 percent which means that for Medicare you get more medical care "bang for the buck".
Simple, we need a one insurance payer system like Medicare. Every doctor, clinic, hospital or any other medical entity does business and medical care as they presently do - they are just paid by one insurance payer. More medical care and less expense and everyone has medical insurance.
Doctors get paid on time and don't have to fight or hire employees to keep contacting 200 different insurance companies with confusing rules for payment. I'm a medical coder, biller and insurance payment collector so I know some of the issues. Amone payment system makes sense to me.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





