Why Chemo Works For Some People And Not Others - MIT Cell Findings Could Predict Individuals' Responses
Main Category: Cancer / OncologyAlso Included In: Genetics; Biology / Biochemistry
Article Date: 20 Sep 2008 - 0:00 PDT
MIT researchers have shown that cells from different people don't all react the same way when exposed to the same DNA-damaging agent - a finding that could help clinicians predict how patients will respond to chemotherapy.
The research team from MIT's Center for Environmental Health Sciences (CEHS) and the Departments of Biological Engineering and Biology, identified a group of 48 genes that can predict how susceptible an individual is to the toxic compound, known as MNNG. The work appears in the Sept. 19 online edition of Genes and Development.
MNNG, a DNA-damaging compound similar to toxic chemicals found in tobacco smoke and in common chemotherapy agents, usually kills cells by inducing irreparable DNA damage. However, the researchers found a wide range of susceptibility among cells taken from healthy people.
"A cell line from one person would be killed dramatically, while that from another person was resistant to exposure," said Rebecca Fry, former MIT research scientist and lead author of the paper. "It wasn't known that cell lines from different people could have such dramatic differences in responses."
Toxic agents such as MNNG create lesions in DNA, provoking the cell to defend itself with a variety of DNA-repair and other pathways. However, every individual expresses slight differences in the genes involved in those pathways.
"Even if everyone is exposed to exactly the same things, they would respond differently, because we're all genetically different," said Leona Samson, senior author of the paper, director of CEHS, and an American Cancer Society Research Professor.
The team members found that after measuring the expression of every gene in each cell line, they could predict cell sensitivity to MNNG from the expression of just 48 specific genes, with 94 percent accuracy.
Several of those 48 genes have already been linked to cancer, said Samson, but it was not known that their expression is already altered before exposure to the DNA damaging agent.
This study is specific to MNNG, but similar efforts are now underway in Samson's lab to predict individuals' responses to other toxic agents, including cisplatin, a common chemotherapy agent, and temozolomide, used to treat brain cancer.
Fry, the lead author of the paper, is now an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health. Other authors are Peter Svensson, a postdoctoral fellow in CEHS; Chandni Valiathan, a graduate student in computational and systems biology; Emma Wang and Brad Hogan, technical assistants in CEHS; Sanchita Bhattacharya, former CEHS research scientist; James Bugni, former CEHS postdoctoral fellow; and Charles Whittaker, a research scientist in the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research.
The research was funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Cancer Institute.
By Anne Trafton, MIT News Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
11 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/121944.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/121944.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Predicting Individuals' Responses To Chemo
posted by Gregory D. Pawelski on 20 Sep 2008 at 9:44 amThere is a headlong rush to develop tests to identify molecular predisposing mechanisms, whose presence still does not guarantee that a drug will be effective for an individual patient. Nor can they, for any patient or even large group of patients, discriminate the potential for clinical activity among different agents of the same class.
The challenge is to identify which patients targeted treatment will be most effective. Tumors can become resistant to a targeted treatment, or the drug no longer works, even if it has previously been effective in shrinking a tumor. Drugs are combined with existing ones to target the tumor more effectively. Most cancers cannot be effectively treated with targeted drugs alone.
What is needed is to measure the net effect of all processes within the cancer, acting with and against each other in real time, and test living cells actually exposed to drugs and drug combinations of interest. The key to understanding the genome is understanding how cells work. How is the cell being killed regardless of the mechanism?
The core understanding is the cell, composed of hundreds of complex molecules that regulate the pathways necessary for vital cellular functions. If a targeted drug could perturb any of these pathways, it is important to examine the effects of drug combinations within the context of the cell.
Both genomics and proeomics can identify potential therapeutic targets, but these targets require the determination of cellular endpoints. You still need to measure the net effect of all processes, not just the individual molecular targets.
Literature Citation:
Eur J Clin Invest, Volume 37(suppl. 1):60, April 2007
BMJ 2007;334(suppl 1):s18 (6 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.39034.719942.94
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.





