HHS Proposed Regulation 'Should Be Adopted,' Opinion Piece Says

Main Category: Primary Care / General Practice
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology;  Nursing / Midwifery
Article Date: 19 Sep 2008 - 10:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated


A proposed HHS regulation that would allow health care providers who receive federal grants to "opt out" of care they reject to based on moral or religious grounds "should be viewed as a positive development and a welcome point of agreement across the political spectrum," Joxel Garcia, an ob-gyn and assistant secretary for health at HHS, writes in a Washington Times opinion piece. Instead, Garcia writes the proposed regulation is "being criticized by people who seem to think that health care workers should be compelled to perform certain medical services against their will." According to Garcia, a patient's ability to receive any legal service would not be threatened by the rule.

However, there is "mounting pressure" to "disregard" the existing laws that "mak[e] clear that a person does not forfeit the right to follow his or her conscience upon the issuance of a medical or nursing degree," Garcia writes. "Health care providers are not merely the equivalent of vending machines, robotically providing a service once they receive enough money -- and thankfully so," Garcia writes, adding that some critics of the regulation "suggest that health care workers with strong, personal convictions should simply get out of the medical field. Such a narrow-minded view shows a lack of concern not only for health care workers but for patients and their health. This is the last thing we need as we face a crippling shortage of workers -- particularly ob-gyns. Instead, the wise approach is the one that has already been established by law: to respect health care workers' rights to abstain from actions that violate their conscience and to respect institutions' rights as well."

According to Garcia, when the rule goes into effect some time after the public comment period ends on Sept. 25, "many health care workers will benefit from clearer guidance and better enforcement of the law, and they and won't have to sacrifice their personal convictions to preserve their professional livelihoods" (Garcia, Washington Times, 9/17).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our primary care / general practice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "HHS Proposed Regulation 'Should Be Adopted,' Opinion Piece Says." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 19 Sep. 2008. Web.
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122085.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, September 19). "HHS Proposed Regulation 'Should Be Adopted,' Opinion Piece Says." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122085.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Primary Care / General Practice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Primary Care News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Primary Care / General Practice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »