Editorial Examines How McCain, Obama Picks For Supreme Court Would Differ

Main Category: Litigation / Medical Malpractice
Also Included In: Public Health;  Abortion;  Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 23 Sep 2008 - 10:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  

Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:5 stars

5 (1 votes)

Healthcare Prof:5 stars

5 (1 votes)


The fact that the next president of the U.S. likely will appoint several Supreme Court justices means that those choices "will determine the future of the law, and of some of Americans' most cherished rights," according to a New York Times editorial.

The editorial says that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) intends to pick moderate justices who "would probably not take the court back onto a distinctly liberal path, but also would be unlikely to create an unbreakable conservative bloc." Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), who supports overturning Roe v. Wade, would be "likely to complete President Bush's campaign to make the court an aggressive right-wing force." According to the editorial, McCain "would appoint justices who could be expected to lead the charge to eliminate the right to abortion." On the other hand, Obama has said that he wants justices who have "the empathy to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom" and that he would make "preserving women's rights under Roe v. Wade a priority as president."

The editorial says that if Obama is elected, "he might merely keep the court on its current moderately conservative course." Under McCain, however, if a "liberal justice or two or three steps down, we may see a very different America," the Times concludes (New York Times, 9/21).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

© 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release.
Visit our litigation / medical malpractice section for the latest news on this subject.
There are no references listed for this article.
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA
National Partnership for Women & Families. "Editorial Examines How McCain, Obama Picks For Supreme Court Would Differ." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 23 Sep. 2008. Web.
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122498.php>

APA
National Partnership for Women & Families. (2008, September 23). "Editorial Examines How McCain, Obama Picks For Supreme Court Would Differ." Medical News Today. Retrieved from
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122498.php.

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Litigation / Medical Malpractice

Most Popular Articles



Follow Our Litigation News On Twitter

Follow Us On Twitter
Get the latest news for this category delivered straight to your Twitter account. Simply visit our Litigation / Medical Malpractice Twitter account and select the 'follow' option.



View list of all 'What Is...' articles »