Clinical Guidelines Cause Substantial Overdiagnosis Of COPD
Main Category: COPDArticle Date: 25 Sep 2008 - 3:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
3 (2 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
1 (1 votes) |
Following current clinical guideline definitions for airflow obstruction is leading to a substantial number of middle-aged and elderly people in primary care being misdiagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), according to Dutch researchers. Tjard Schermer (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands) and colleagues compared the diagnostic outcome when two recommended but different definitions for airflow obstruction based on the forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) were applied in a large population of patients without a prior diagnosis of chronic respiratory disease referred for a diagnostic spirometry test by their general practitioner.
Guidelines recommend a "one size fits all" fixed cut-off point of 0.70 for the FEV1/FVC ratio to decide on whether or not airflow obstruction is present, regardless of the age and gender of the person involved.
Schermer and team used a gender- and age-specific "lower limit of normal" cut-off point for the FEV1/FVC ratio for comparison. Using data from diagnostic spirometry tests of 14,056 respiratory patients (53% female, 69% current or former smokers), the researchers calculated a sensitivity of 97.9% for the fixed cut-off relative to the lower limit of normal cut-off point for COPD, a specificity of 91.2%, a positive predictive value of 72.0% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%.
The discrepancy between the recommended fixed 0.70 FEV1/FVC cut-off and the gender- and age-specific lower limit of normal cut-off became more pronounced as the age of the patients analysed increased: in patients aged 50 years or older, at least 33% were misdiagnosed with airflow obstruction when the fixed cut-off point definition was used!
"Although the negative predictive value of the fixed ratio definition was very high, the positive predictive value of the fixed ratio (72%) was insufficient," the authors write. "As spirometry is used as a diagnostic test to verify obstruction (instead of excluding it), these predictive values are insufficient."
Schermer and team conclude: "Although diagnosing COPD obviously requires more than a spirometry test (i.e. symptoms, smoking history and additional diagnostic tests), a definition of airflow obstruction that is based on lower limits of normal from an appropriate reference population would diminish the rate of false positive interpretations". The authors add: "The individual, as well as the societal, burden of COPD is sufficiently large to warrant critical appraisal of the main criterion on which the diagnosis of the disease is based."
Title Of The Original Article
"Current clinical guideline definitions of airflow obstruction and COPD overdiagnosis in primary care."
The European Respiratory Journal is the peer-reviewed scientific publication of the European Respiratory Society (more than 8,000 specialists in lung diseases and respiratory medicine in Europe, the United States and Australia).
European Respiratory Journal
Visit our copd section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
16 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122945.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/122945.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




