Republican Senators Block Plan To Pass Mental Health Parity Bill By Unanimous Consent
Main Category: Mental HealthAlso Included In: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 26 Sep 2008 - 6:00 PDT
| Patient / Public: | ![]() |
4.33 (3 votes) |
| Healthcare Prof: | ![]() |
3 (1 votes) |
| Article Opinions: | 1 posts |
Senate Democrats on Wednesday tried to determine whether House-approved mental health parity legislation (HR 6983) could pass by unanimous consent but faced opposition from Republicans, CongressDaily reports (CongressDaily, 9/25). The bill would require health insurers to cover mental illnesses at the same level as physical ailments. The House on Tuesday approved the bill as a stand-alone measure, while the Senate attached its mental health parity bill to legislation (HR 6049, S 3335) that would delay expiring tax breaks, among other things (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 9/24).
According to a GOP aide, Republicans were concerned that support for a free-standing measure would reopen the bipartisan Senate tax-extender package. Senators have said that the tax-extender package cannot be changed or the agreement reached on the legislation would fall apart. According to CongressDaily, House Democratic leaders are not acting on the Senate package and "instead chopped it up for consideration and did not include mental health parity" (CongressDaily, 9/25).
Compromise Legislation Examined
Two newspapers on Thursday examined the House and Senate approval on Tuesday of compromise mental health parity legislation. Summaries appear below.
- AP/Philadelphia Inquirer: The "two chambers will have to pass a final version before it can become law, but time is quickly passing for this Congress," the AP/Inquirer reports. The measure is expected to cost the federal government about $3.4 billion over 10 years, and private companies are expected to deduct more health expenses from federal income taxes (Freking, AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 9/25).
- Wall Street Journal: "Over the last 15 years, both the House and Senate had passed different versions of the bill, only to see them founder," but now "the bill has support of business and insurance groups," the Journal reports. According to a recent Hewitt Associates survey, about one in four employers already offers mental health parity, though it is not clear whether those plans would follow the bill's requirements. President Bush has expressed support for the measure, and if he signs it into law, the legislation would take effect nationwide in January 2010 (Zhang, Wall Street Journal, 9/25).
© 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
Visit our mental health section for the latest news on this subject.
MLA
15 Feb. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/123124.php>
APA
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/123124.php.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
|
Rate this article: (Hover over the stars then click to rate) |
Patient / Public: |
or |
Health Professional: |
Visitor Opinions In Chronological Order (1)
Mental Health Parity
posted by Dr. Jim Sendelbach on 30 Sep 2008 at 7:17 pmHere's another good example of why Congress gets such poor ratings. For 15 years various versions of a parity bill have been kicking around and yet we wait and wait for something that is so desperately needed. Congress is so out of touch with what we the people need.
Add Your Opinion
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
![]()
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.




